Get This Daily Newsletter by Email

Retirement Plans Newsletter

March 24, 2026

BenefitsLink.com logo
EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com logo

💼  3 New Job Opportunities

 

[Guidance Overview]

DOL Rolls Back 2024 Fiduciary Rule and 2020 Interpretation of Five-Part Test

"The DOL [moved] to re-codify the DOL's 1975 regulation providing that a person will be deemed an investment advice fiduciary if all elements of a five-part test are met (the 'Five-Part Test') and confirm that the pre-amendment versions of the PTEs will be restored. At the same time, the DOL withdrew its preamble to PTE 2020-02, which contained an interpretation of the Five-Part Test that also gave rise to litigation."  MORE >>

Groom Law Group

[Guidance Overview]

ERISA's Five-Part Test Defining Investment-Advice Fiduciary Formally Reinstated by the DOL

"[T]he DOL republished Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02 in its original unamended form as well as the five-part test for defining investment advice fiduciary that has been in effect for decades.... [The DOL] also withdrew in its entirety the 2020 preamble to the amended fiduciary rule ... which contained expansive and controversial interpretations of the five-part test."  MORE >>

The Wagner Law Group

[Guidance Overview]

After-Tax Contributions and Safe Harbor Plans

"[T]he exemption for safe harbor 401(k) plans related to top-heavy testing is nullified when after-tax contributions are present. In such cases, the safe harbor plan must satisfy top-heavy requirements. However, the plan can take safe harbor nonelective and matching contributions into account in determining whether an employer has satisfied its top-heavy minimum-contribution obligation."  MORE >>

The Retirement Advantage

[Guidance Overview]

A Retirement Plan Sponsor's Guide to Nondiscrimination Testing: Which Plans Are Affected, Which Are Exempt, and What Testing Entails

"Plan sponsors need to keep their plans in compliance with the nondiscrimination rules to remain qualified, and this is normally accomplished by performing annual testing that demonstrates compliance. In certain cases where a plan passes the testing by a significant margin, plan sponsors are permitted to perform the testing on a three-year cycle if there have been no significant changes to the plan or the workforce."  MORE >>

Milliman

Wave of Lawsuits Targets 401(k)s That Use American Century TDFs

"Plan sponsors were hit with 15 [ERISA] complaints in recent weeks alleging they breached their fiduciary duties by retaining American Century's One Choice target-date fund suite, which for years has underperformed peers  ... The suits span plans of varying sizes, from roughly $120 million to more than $1 billion[.]"  MORE >>

Ignites

[Sponsor]

2026 CCA Enrolled Actuaries Conference | Virtual

Choose from 39 sessions covering topics in single-employer, multiemployer, public plans, small plans and other topics relevant to pension professionals. Earn up to 18.5 EA credits, including 2.0 EA Ethics & 1.5 credits toward bias topics. Learn more.

Sponsored by Conference of Consulting Actuaries [CCA]

2026 Retirement Plan Landscape Report

"[1] Participants in larger plans may benefit from lower fees than those in smaller plans.... [2] Collective Investment Trusts now hold 42% of DC plan assets as sponsors seek lower costs.... [3] Despite over $6.3 trillion in DC plan outflows since 2015, this dynamic environment creates new opportunities for innovation and participant engagement. [4] DB plans ... account for a quarter of retirement distributions and support nearly 30 million people."  MORE >>

Morningstar; registration required

Why Federal Employees May Want to Slow Down Before Doing Roth Conversions in 2026

"[F]or federal employees and other government workers, the decision to convert money from a Traditional TSP to Roth may require more careful timing than the headlines suggest. As 2026 approaches, Roth conversions are still allowed, but the tax planning surrounding them is becoming more complex."  MORE >>

Government Executive

Young Spouse, Spousal Rollover, Year-of-Death RMD and a Penalty?

"[C]ustodians will typically transfer all the assets from the deceased IRA owner's account to the beneficiary, and then the year-of-death RMD can be paid out from the inherited account. But in this case, there was an extra layer of rules to consider. The surviving spouse wanted to do a spousal rollover ... However, if we processed a spousal rollover, and if the surviving spouse then took the year-of-death RMD before turning 59½, a 10% early distribution penalty would apply."  MORE >>

Slott Report

'Destruction of Capitalism': EBSA Official Doubles Down on ESG Attack

"A senior policy advisor for the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) stood by his earlier characterization of ESG as an example of Marxism at the Investment Adviser Association (IAA) Compliance Conference in Washington. The remarks could be a sign of things to come for ESG policy at the [DOL]."  MORE >>

American Retirement Association [ARA]

[Opinion]

Retirement System Breakdown Lies in Plan Access Issues

"It's one thing to have access to advice; it's another thing entirely to implement it effectively, particularly when plan structures or service provider practices limit how advice is implemented. Defined contribution plans, by design, give individuals responsibility over their accounts. When that responsibility exists without the ability to meaningfully exercise choice, it's time to examine whether the system is functioning as intended."  MORE >>

Lisa Gomez in WealthManagement.com

Employee Benefits Jobs

💼

Participant Support Representative

Daybright Financial

Rochester NY / Hybrid

View job as Participant Support Representative for Daybright Financial

💼

Remittance Specialist

Daybright Financial

Rochester NY / Fort Walton Beach FL / Hybrid

View job as Remittance Specialist for Daybright Financial

💼

Manager, Retirement Account Management - PEP

Alerus

Remote / AR / MN / ND

View job as Manager, Retirement Account Management - PEP for Alerus

Selected New Discussions

401(k) Hardship Request: Casualty Deduction

"I struggle with understanding the Casualty deduction reason for hardship withdrawals. I am not sure if it applies in this case and am asking for any opinions or interpretations. A bad storm blew through and damaged the roof of a 401k participant's house. Not a federal disaster area and it was his principal residence. The insurance will pay for the repairs but he has a $1000 deductible which he does not have. Can her receive this from the 401k plan under the Casualty deduction reason?"

BenefitsLink® Message Boards

Webinars, Podcasts and Conferences
(Retirement Plans / Executive Compensation)

Private Investment Funds and Withdrawal Liability

PODCAST

Proskauer

High Impact Retirement Plan RFPs

April 15, 2026 WEBINAR

CAPTRUST Financial Advisors

Economic Outlook and Pension Assumption Setting

April 22, 2026 WEBINAR

Conference of Consulting Actuaries

Last Issue's Most Popular Items

Target-Date Family Targeted in Tsunami of Recent 401(k) Underperformance Lawsuits

American Retirement Association [ARA]

Back to the Future: DOL Reinstates 1975 Fiduciary Test

Snell & Wilmer

Text of IRS Notice 2026-23: Public Recommendations Invited on Items to Be Included on the 2026-2027 Priority Guidance Plan (PDF)

Internal Revenue Service [IRS]

Unsubscribe  |   Change Email Address

Search Past Issues   |   Privacy Policy

Submit an Article   |   Contact Us   |   Advertise Here

Copyright 2026 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.

BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.

Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.