|
Retirement Plans Newsletter
March 30, 2026
|
|
|
|
💼 3 New Job Opportunities
|
| |
|
[Guidance Overview]
DOL Fact Sheet: Fiduciary Duties in Selecting Designated Investment Alternatives Proposed Rule
"The proposed regulation establishes a process-based safe harbor for plan fiduciaries when they select designated investment
alternatives. It identifies a non-exhaustive list of six factors for a plan fiduciary to objectively, thoroughly, and analytically consider and make determinations about when selecting designated investment alternatives. When a plan fiduciary does so following the process described in the proposed regulation with respect to any of the six factors, its judgment regarding the factor or factors is presumed to have met the fiduciary's duties
under section 404(a)(1)(B) of ERISA." MORE >>
Employee Benefits Security Administration [EBSA], U.S. Department of Labor [DOL]
|
|
[Guidance Overview]
Asset-Neutral ERISA 'Investment Selection Rule' Proposal Released by DOL
"At its core, the Investment Selection Rule is asset-neutral and focused on reinforcing the long-standing ERISA fiduciary
process standard that governs how plan investment decisions are made....This is guidance you can actually use -- in committee meetings, in documentation, and in provider oversight. The rule provides fiduciaries with a clearer roadmap for navigating an increasingly complex investment landscape." MORE >>
American Retirement Association [ARA]
|
|
[Guidance Overview]
Utah Launches Retirement Plan Exchange to Close Coverage Gap
"The new law creates the Utah Retirement Plan Exchange, a program through which eligible private-sector employers can easily set up a retirement plan through the exchange or adopt an auto-IRA program to provide coverage for their employees. The exchange will walk employers
through a set of questions that guide them along a pathway to establishing the retirement program that best fits their situation." MORE >>
American Retirement Association [ARA]
|
|
District Court Dismisses Case Against Fidelity Over Money Market Fund Fees
"A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit that accused Fidelity of letting certain 'retail class' investors in its Fidelity Government Money Market Fund lose millions of dollars a year to high expenses when they're eligible for lower-cost 'premium' shares. The
complaint alleged Fidelity and fund officials let some customers holding the money market mutual fund's retail share class (SPAXX) 'needlessly incur higher expenses' even when eligible for its lower-expense but otherwise identical premium share class (FZCXX)." [Davis v.
Fidelity Management & Research Co LLC, No. 24-8142 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2026)] MORE >>
ThinkAdvisor
|
|
District Court Decision Shows Importance of 'Plan Assets' Analysis Under ERISA
"The court embarked on a learned exploration of the application of the [DOL's regulation defining plan assets] to distinctions between debt and equity that even addressed the nuances surrounding notes as compared with trust certificates. And the court also addressed ...
the question of whether, in the face of plan assets, a service provider might have fiduciary authority. A possible object lesson here is that the fundamental plan-assets analysis, however arcane, may really matter." [Powell v. Ocwen Financial Corporation, No. 18-1951
(SDNY June 1, 2023)] MORE >>
The Wagner Law Group
|
|
Equity Compensation's Impact on the 401(k) Plan
"In the last few years, the bigger shift hasn't been 'equity vs. no equity' as much as how companies use equity compensation. Private companies are increasingly using Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) in later stages and mixing RSUs with options, rather than only options.
The shift in equity compensation usage is prompting questions from payroll and benefits professionals because of the impact on the company's 401(k) plan." MORE >>
Newfront
|
|
Declining Plan Fees Reshape Retirement Industry Focus
"There are few, if any, other industries in which costs have declined as precipitously as in defined contribution.... As a result of the hyperfocus on fees, record keeper service has deteriorated, and most wealth advisors and their broker/dealers stayed away from a high
liability, low margin business.... But the upside of this race to the bottom has been the focus on the participant ... The DC platform has become the hub for providing advice on all aspects of a participant's financial well-being, including selecting the right benefits. " MORE >>
WealthManagement.com
|
|
[Opinion]
Advocates Say Death of Fiduciary Rule Puts Consumers Back in Limbo
"Insurance agents, annuity sellers, brokers and other sales-oriented professionals providing one-time rollover or product recommendations ... are no longer treated as ERISA fiduciaries.... To be considered a fiduciary, an advisor must provide advice on a regular basis,
pursuant to a mutual agreement, that serves as a primary basis for investment decisions and is individualized to the client. Critics say that framework breaks down in a world dominated by rollovers and episodic advice." MORE >>
Financial Advisor
|
|
[Opinion]
Should Your Withdrawal Plan Anticipate Future Social Security Benefit Cuts?
"Most older Americans want Congress to 'save Social Security (and Medicare).' Many of those individuals believe (hope) that Congress will not reduce their benefits, but will, instead, save the system through increased revenue, from some source that will presumably not
negatively affect them. And maybe this will be what happens, or maybe not. It is arguably more prudent and conservative to assume some level of benefit cuts will occur than to assume none." MORE >>
Ken Steiner, FSA Retired
|
Benefits in General |
|
[Guidance Overview]
Decoding the DOL's 2026 Enforcement Strategy for Plan Sponsors and Service Providers (PDF)
"EBSA's explicit focus on removing barriers to mental health and substance use disorder benefits and on surprise billing, together with added emphasis on cybersecurity and selected plan investment conflict areas, makes clear that plan sponsors and service providers should be
prepared for a DOL investigation in these areas.... [T]here are several practical considerations for plan sponsors and service providers that can make an investigation quicker and less painful." MORE >>
Thompson Hine in Benefits Law Journal
|
Executive Compensation and Nonqualified Plans |
|
Private Company Tender Offers: Things Employees Need To Know
"The number of shares you can sell depends on both individual limits and the total level of participation. If you have held the shares for any period before the tender offer and sell the stock at a premium over your company's current internal valuation, the tax treatment for
that part of the gain is uncertain.... Advisors often recommend selling shares to diversify. However, the potential downside to selling shares now is that it could take away from much greater gains later in any IPO." MORE >>
myStockOptions.com
|
|
Employee Benefits Jobs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected New Discussions |
|
HPI and Lowering S-Corp Owner's W-2 Compensation
"An accountant is asking if he can just lower the W-2 compensation of the S-corp owner so that it's below the HPI threshold and that gets the owner out of the new Roth catch-up rule. Can they shift more income to the dividend K-1 and avoid the issue that simply? Sure, it
lowers their overall employer benefit, but I suspect some will find that a fair trade-off."
BenefitsLink® Message Boards
|
|
No Match on Catch Up with Separate Elections
"The plan document states that catch-up contributions are not matched. In operation, the client uses a separate election for catch up contributions (regardless of the mandatory Roth catch up rules). The match is per pay period and there is no true up. No limit on
deferrals. "My understanding is that a catch up contribution is not a 'catch-up' until it exceeds a plan or statutory limit. The issue is that the plan's payroll provider has not been matching on any contributions that are in the elected catch up bucket. As an
extreme example, let's consider 2 participants both over 50: Participant 1 elects only catch up deferrals and has $0 in the regular catch up election. Participant 2 elects only regular deferrals and $0 in the catch up election. Both employees defer a total of $7,500. Part. 1 gets no match and Part. 2 gets the full match. "IMHO -- I think they both are owed the match because no plan or statutory limit has been exceeded. Wanted to see if anyone else had run into this situation, especially now that separate elections are an option for handling the mandatory Roth catch-ups. I have also considered that this impacts more than just the match allocation, because the $7,500 in deferrals should be
included in the ADP test for participant 1, not to mention the 415 limits. Thoughts?"
BenefitsLink® Message Boards
|
|
|
Press Releases |
|
Dylan Jones Promoted to Internal Plan Consultant at The Retirement Advantage, Inc. (TRA)®
TRA [The Retirement Advantage]
|
|
aequum LLC CEO Christine Cooper Appointed to Self-Insurance Institute of America’s Board of Directors
aequum LLC
|
|
401(k) Averages Book 26th Edition Highlights Continued Fee Compression and Ongoing Disparities in Plan Costs
401k Averages Book
|
|
|
Webinars, Podcasts and Conferences (Retirement Plans / Executive Compensation) |
|
Plan Committees: Best Practices
ON-DEMAND WEBINAR
KLB Benefits Law Group
|
|
|
Last Issue's Most Popular Items |
|
Text of DOL Proposed Regs: Fiduciary Duties In Selecting Designated Investment Alternatives (PDF)
Employee Benefits Security Administration [EBSA], U.S. Department of Labor [DOL]
|
|
DOL Finally Delivers Proposed SECURE 2.0 E-Disclosure Rule Changes
Mercer
|
|
DOL Proposes Landmark Rule to Democratize Access to Alternative Investments in 401(k) Plans
Employee Benefits Security Administration [EBSA], U.S. Department of Labor [DOL]
|
|
Unsubscribe |
Change Email Address
Search Past Issues |
Privacy Policy
Submit an Article |
Contact Us |
Advertise Here
Copyright 2026 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
|