|
Retirement Plans Newsletter
May 22, 2026
|
|
|
| |
|
[Guidance Overview]
IRS Issues Guidance on Qualified Long-Term-Care Distributions
"[Notice 2026-33] stated that 'no distribution will be treated as a qualified long-term care distribution unless a
long-term care premium statement with respect to the employee has been filed with the plan.'... As a safe harbor, plan administrators are explicitly permitted to rely on the carriers' long-term-care premium statement to verify that: an issuer disclosure was made to the Secretary of the Treasury by the provider of the long-term-care coverage; the insurance is certified; and the premium amounts are correct." MORE >>
PLANSPONSOR; registration may be required
|
|
[Guidance Overview]
Update Regarding Paper Delivery of Retirement Plan Statements
"If a plan administrator uses the 2002 and/or the 2020 safe harbors, the content of notices and disclosures related to benefit statements likely need to be revised when the 2026 Proposed Regulations are finalized.... [E]mployers may wish to split the process into two elections -- one for the electronic delivery of statements and one for the electronic delivery of all other plan communications. Otherwise, a person who elects into paper statements would need to receive all plan communications on paper. " MORE >>
Vorys
|
|
Supreme Court: Withdrawal Liability Assessment May Arise from Actuarial Assumptions Adopted After Measurement Date
"A unanimous U.S. Supreme Court ruled that ERISA does not require pension plans to assess withdrawal liability based on actuarial assumptions adopted before the measurement date.... [R]equiring actuaries to use assumptions selected before the measurement date could
prevent them from relying on the most up-to-date data when selecting their assumption." [M&K Employee Solutions, LLC v. Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund, No. 23-1209 (S. Ct. May 21, 2026)] MORE >>
Wolters Kluwer | VitalLaw
|
|
Supreme Court: Actuary Is Not Required to Select Withdrawal Liability Assumptions 'As Of' the Measurement Date
"[T]he US Supreme Court ... [held] that, under [ERISA], an actuary for an underfunded multiemployer pension plan may calculate an employer's withdrawal liability based on actuarial assumptions adopted after the relevant measurement date for withdrawal liability. In other
words, the actuary is not required to select actuarial assumptions 'as of' the measurement date." [M&K Employee Solutions, LLC v. Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund, No. 23-1209 (S. Ct. May 21, 2026)] MORE >>
Faegre Drinker
|
|
SCOTUS Sides with Pension Fund in Withdrawal Liability Calculation Dispute
"Employers planning to exit a multiemployer pension fund may wish to carefully consider the timing of the withdrawal. The measurement date for withdrawal liability will be the end of the plan's fiscal year prior to withdrawal, but the actuarial assumptions may be tied to a
later date." [M&K Employee Solutions, LLC v. Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund, No. 23-1209 (S. Ct. May 21, 2026)] MORE >>
Ogletree Deakins
|
|
Supreme Court Rules in Withdrawal Liability Case
"In a unanimous decision delivered by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the Court held that ERISA Sections 1391 and 1393, which govern the calculation of withdrawal liability, do not require the actuarial assumptions to be selected on or before the measurement date. Instead, the
Court said that the 'as of' language in Section 1391 means that while the hard data that feeds the UVB calculation must be fixed on the measurement date, the calculation itself can be performed after the date." [M&K Employee Solutions, LLC v. Trustees of the IAM
National Pension Fund, No. 23-1209 (S. Ct. May 21, 2026)] MORE >>
International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans [IFEBP]
|
|
Acquiring a Company with a 401(k) Plan: A Practical Guide for Buyers
"Why timing matters: The successor plan rule and pre-closing 401(k) plan termination ... Buyer's post-closing options if the plan is not terminated before closing ... Practical issues and potential complications for buyers to consider: [1] Outstanding
participant 401(k) plan loans ... [2] Recordkeeper requirements ... [3] Plan investment options with unique potential costs or timing considerations." MORE >>
Foley & Lardner LLP
|
Benefits in General |
|
House Committee Passes Health Care and Retirement Security Bills
"The Education and Workforce Committee passed [bills on May 21 which would] ... increase health care transparency, lower prescription drug costs, and strengthen retirement security.... [1] Form 5500 Filing Simplification Act [HR 7362] ... cuts unnecessary paperwork for retirement and employee benefit plans by simplifying federal reporting requirements and updating filing rules. [2] PBM Kickback Prohibition Act [HR 7895] cracks down on PBM kickbacks and helps ensure health plan design decisions are made in the best interest of patients and employers -- not corporate middlemen. [3] Transparency in Billing Act of
2026 [HR 8684] ... increases transparency for workers and families by requiring hospitals to bill honestly about where services are being provided." MORE >>
Committee on Education and the Workforce, U.S. House of Representatives
|
|
Employers, Workers, and the New World of Work (PDF)
106 pages. "[This report] provides an in-depth view of employers' organizational concerns, business practices, and health, welfare, and retirement benefit offerings. The report compares employer perceptions versus worker realities, and it breaks down survey findings by
company size. It also discusses best practices and outlines recommendations for employers." MORE >>
Transamerica Institute
|
Selected New Discussions |
|
Principal Residence for Hardship Distribution - Travel Trailer
"Would a travel trailer qualify as a principal residence? Participant is wanting to purchase and place in a trailer park."
BenefitsLink® Message Boards
|
|
Terminating Cash Balance Plan and Crediting Interest
"CBP has fixed 6% interest crediting rate and (per pre-approved plan document selection) does NOT provide interim interest to the annuity starting date. Plan terminated, effective 12/31/2025 (also PYE) and will pay out on 6/1/2026, the ASD -- there is no requirement to
override the plan provision and provide interim interest (5/12 of 6%), correct? That's true even if we had to average prior 5 years of variable ICRs, yes? I see in the basic document the averaging requirement but nothing requiring an interim credit."
BenefitsLink® Message Boards
|
|
|
Webinars, Podcasts and Conferences (Retirement Plans / Executive Compensation) |
|
Roth Employer Contributions: More Ways to Roth
May 27, 2026 WEBINAR
TRA [The Retirement Advantage]
|
|
|
Last Issue's Most Popular Items |
|
IRS Issues Guidance on SECURE 2.0 Long-Term Care Distributions
Plan Sponsor Council of America [PSCA]
|
|
IRS Fact Sheet: Issuer Disclosures for Certified Long-Term Care Insurance
Internal Revenue Service [IRS]
|
|
Supreme Court Opinion: ERISA Does Not Require That Actuarial Assumptions for Calculating Withdrawal Liability Be Selected on or Before the Measurement Date (PDF)
Supreme Court of the United States
|
|
Unsubscribe |
Change Email Address
Search Past Issues |
Privacy Policy
Submit an Article |
Contact Us |
Advertise Here
Copyright 2026 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
|