|
Retirement Plans Newsletter
June 1, 2026
|
|
|
| |
|
U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies When Withdrawal Liability Assumptions May Be Adopted
"[T]he Court affirmed the D.C. Circuit's view that ERISA does not require actuarial assumptions to be selected on or before the measurement date, so long as the withdrawal liability is calculated as of that date. That approach conflicted with the Second Circuit's 2020
decision ... where the court rejected a withdrawal liability assessment based on assumptions adopted after the measurement date.... By adopting the D.C. Circuit's reading, the Supreme Court eliminated that disagreement and established a uniform national rule on the timing of assumption selection for withdrawal liability calculations." [M&K Employee Solutions, LLC v. Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund, No. 23-1209 (S. Ct. May 21, 2026)] MORE >>
Milliman
|
|
Supreme Court Addresses Calculation of Actuarial Assumptions in ERISA Withdrawal Liability
"The Court explained.... that the statutory language in 29 U.S.C. Section 1391's directive to calculate withdrawal
liability based on plan assets and liabilities 'as of' the measurement date identifies the relevant valuation point but does not prescribe when the underlying assumptions must be chosen. The Court rejected the petitioners' argument that this language imposes a cutoff, emphasizing that it fixes the point in time for measuring liability rather than regulating the timing of actuarial decision-making." [M&K Employee Solutions, LLC v. Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund, No. 23-1209 (S. Ct. May 21, 2026)] MORE >>
Miller & Chevalier
|
|
Supreme Court Withdrawal Liability Decision Is Narrow in Scope
"Under the decision, actuaries for multiemployer pension plans are clearly able to set or change the withdrawal liability assumptions after the end of a plan year. The issue as to whether, as the D.C. Circuit held, the assumptions had to be based (or were based) on information
available as of the end of the plan year will likely be the subject of future arbitrations and future cases." [M&K Employee Solutions, LLC v. Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund, No. 23-1209 (S. Ct. May 21, 2026)] MORE >>
Cheiron
|
|
Seventh Circuit Affirms Central States’ Authority to Expel a Single Bargaining Unit and Holds Withdrawal-Date Counterclaim Must Be Arbitrated
"Applying deferential review, the court declined to disturb the Trustees' reasonable interpretation that the Expulsion Provision permitted termination of a single bargaining unit without expelling all of Penske's other units.... The court next held that Central
States' decision to expel Local 745 was not arbitrary or capricious.... Finally, the court affirmed dismissal of Central States' counterclaim seeking a declaration that Local 745's effective withdrawal date was 2021." [Penske Truck Leasing, L.P. v. Central States, Southeast
& Southwest Areas Pension Plan, No. 25-1738 (7th Cir. May 29, 2026)] MORE >>
Roberts Disability Law
|
|
Cost Efficiency and Investment Governance for Public Pension Plans
"A disciplined approach to uncovering hidden costs in portfolios can be critical to understanding the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO), improving governance, and fulfilling fiduciary responsibilities.... TCO addresses cost drivers across the investment value chain, from management
fees to trade execution, settlement, and custody costs. Plan sponsors can achieve this with a bottom-up analysis of all cost elements and operational processes that prioritize risk management, transparency, and contract compliance." MORE >>
National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems [NCPERS]
|
|
Comment Deadline Is Today on DOL's Proposed Investment Rule
"Among the nearly 40,000 comments through May 29, were hundreds, if not thousands, of identical messages from individuals
both supporting and decrying the proposal as either a great opportunity for retirement plan investors, or a great danger to them." MORE >>
PLANSPONSOR; registration may be required
|
|
[Opinion]
Target Date Fund Fiduciary Due Diligence Guardrail Checklist
"CFA institute warns that the DOL pathway allowing alternatives needs stronger Guardrails especially around target date
funds.... [F]iduciaries must evaluate not only the Target Date Fund itself, but each underlying investment component individually.... [I]ncreasingly, Target Date Funds are being moved into weakly regulated state-bank Collective Investment Trusts (CITs) ... The fiduciary obligation therefore requires substantially enhanced due diligence." MORE >>
The Commonsense 401(k) Project
|
|
[Opinion]
ERIC Comment Letter to DOL: Fiduciary Duties in Selecting Designated Investment Alternatives (PDF)
19 pages. "[T]he Proposed Regulation is a crucial step in restoring balance, limiting meritless litigation, and reducing uncertainty and improving outcomes for retirement savers.... Certainty and predictability in legal standards are absolutely essential to our retirement system,
and the NPRM is an important step.... We strongly support the NPRM because it generally adopts the framework the retirement community has recommended and because it has the potential to meaningfully improve the ability of tens of millions of Americans to save for retirement." MORE >>
U.S. Court of Appeals for the ___ Circuit
|
Selected New Discussions |
|
Life Insurance Rollovers
"A plan has life insurance contracts, mostly whole life, with very sizeable cash values. A participant that is well beyond RMD age is planning to retire this year. To date, no portion of the Life insurance has been swapped out. Participant will continue to do some consulting
and have continuing 1099 income. Financial advisor wants to pitch the idea of rolling over the life insurance policy in-kind into a solo-K for the participant (along with the other plan assets), so that life insurance policy can continue. It is my understanding that life insurance can be rolled over in-kind as long as the distributing plan allows (which is does) and the new plan allows for life insurance (it will be drafted as such). It is
also my understanding that rollovers do not count toward the incidental benefits test, so the plan would not violate this if the premiums are being paid from rollover funds. Is this correct? ... "What happens with the 40 years of PS 58 costs that have accumulated to date
under the original plan? Going forward the premiums will be paid by employee (pre-tax rollover) contributions, would these be includable in income (would he still need a 1099 for PS 58 costs each year?) He has sufficient assets (if he rolls over his other funds) to take his annual RMDs from those assets. What pitfalls do you see with this plan? How does he get ultimately get these policies out of the plan into his personal ownership? Can
partial swap outs be made?"
BenefitsLink® Message Boards
|
|
|
Press Releases |
|
Michael Best Welcomes Steve Flores as Executive Compensation Partner in Labor and Employment Practice
Michael Best & Friedrich
|
|
OneAmerica Financial® Selects FINEOS AdminSuite to Modernize and Enhance Employee Benefits Customer Experience
OneAmerica Financial
|
|
|
Last Issue's Most Popular Items |
|
Fitting Alternative Assets with ERISA DC Plans: More Takeaways from DOL's Proposed 401(k) DIA Selection Rule
Morgan Lewis
|
|
Reading the Tea Leaves: Opportunities in the DOL’s Proposed Fiduciary Rule
American Retirement Association [ARA]
|
|
DOL Provides Interim Relief on SECURE 2.0 Paper Statement Rules While Final Regs Remain Pending
Trucker Huss
|
|
Unsubscribe |
Change Email Address
Search Past Issues |
Privacy Policy
Submit an Article |
Contact Us |
Advertise Here
Copyright 2026 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
|