Featured Jobs
|
BPAS
|
|
Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
July Business Services
|
|
DC Retirement Plan Administrator Michigan Pension & Actuarial Services, LLC
|
|
Compass
|
|
Relationship Manager for Defined Benefit/Cash Balance Plans Daybright Financial
|
|
Combo Retirement Plan Administrator Strongpoint Partners
|
|
ESOP Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
|
Managing Director - Operations, Benefits Daybright Financial
|
|
Mergers & Acquisition Specialist Compass
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement USA LLC
|
|
Cash Balance/ Defined Benefit Plan Administrator Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions
|
|
Strongpoint Partners
|
|
Retirement Plan Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
Guest Article
(From the August 18, 2008 issue of Deloitte's Washington Bulletin, a periodic update of legal and regulatory developments relating to Employee Benefits.)
The Employee Benefits Security Administration of the Department of Labor (DOL) updated its ERISA enforcement manual to include new provisions regarding gifts to fiduciaries. While the manual does not serve as public guidance, DOL employees use it for internal administrative purposes such as in conducting plan audits.
ERISA § 406(b)(3) prohibits a fiduciary from receiving "any consideration for his own personal account from any party dealing with such plan in connection with a transaction involving the assets of the plan."
A DOL investigator who identifies a possible fiduciary violation involving a plan fiduciary's acceptance of meals, gifts, entertainment, or educational expenses from a party dealing with the plan is advised in the Enforcement Manual to determine whether ERISA § 406(b)(3) has been violated. The investigator is further advised to determine whether the plan maintains a "reasonable written policy " regarding the receipt of the items.
The Enforcement Manual carves out two circumstances where investigators are generally to conclude that no violation of ERISA § 406(b)(3) has occurred:
|
![]() | The information in this Washington Bulletin is general in nature only and not intended to provide advice or guidance for specific situations.
If you have any questions or need additional information about articles appearing in this or previous versions of Washington Bulletin, please contact: Robert Davis 202.879.3094, Elizabeth Drigotas 202.879.4985, Elizabeth Drigotas 202.879.4985, Mary Jones 202.378.5067, Stephen LaGarde 202.879-5608, Erinn Madden 202.572.7677, Bart Massey 202.220.2104, Mark Neilio 202.378.5046, Tom Pevarnik 202.879.5314, Sandra Rolitsky 202.220.2025, Tom Veal 312.946.2595, Deborah Walker 202.879.4955. Copyright 2008, Deloitte. |
BenefitsLink is an independent national employee benefits information provider, not formally affiliated with the firms and companies who kindly provide much of the content and advertisements published on this Web site, including the article shown above. |