Featured Jobs
|
Cash Balance/ Defined Benefit Plan Administrator Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC
|
|
July Business Services
|
|
Relationship Manager for Defined Benefit/Cash Balance Plans Daybright Financial
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Mergers & Acquisition Specialist Compass
|
|
ESOP Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
|
Managing Director - Operations, Benefits Daybright Financial
|
|
DC Retirement Plan Administrator Michigan Pension & Actuarial Services, LLC
|
|
Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions
|
|
Compass
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement USA LLC
|
|
Retirement Plan Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
Guest Article
(From the August 25, 2008 issue of Deloitte's Washington Bulletin, a periodic update of legal and regulatory developments relating to Employee Benefits.)
Under a common arrangement, public school and other employees who provide services during only a portion of the year can elect to be paid ratably over 12 months. This "election to defer" payment can trigger the unwanted application of IRC § 457(f) which governs certain deferred compensation plans of tax-exempt entities and state and local governments, and IRC § 409A which otherwise governs amounts deferred under nonqualified deferred compensation plans. IRS recently issued guidance to preclude the unwanted application of IRC §§ 457(f) & 409A to these and other similar arrangements. IRS Notice 2008-62.
The Problem: Taxation before the Compensation Is Paid
Internal Revenue Code § 457 governs deferred compensation plans of state and local governments and tax-exempt organizations. If such a sponsor sets up a plan that satisfies the requirements of IRC § 457 (i.e., deferrals are limited to the applicable dollar amount, the distribution requirements are met, etc.) the plan is an "eligible" IRC § 457 plan and the amounts deferred are not taxable until they are paid or otherwise made available to the participant. However, if the sponsor's plan does not meet the requirements of IRC § 457, the plan is an "ineligible" plan under IRC § 457(f) and the amounts deferred are taxable in the first taxable year in which they are not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture.
Separately, IRC § 409A governs when amounts deferred under a nonqualified deferred compensation plan are included in gross income. Like IRC § 457(f), it provides that if the requirements of IRC § 409A are not satisfied (i.e., timing of elections, restrictions on distributions, etc.) for any taxable year, the amounts deferred under the plan are taxable that year to the extent they are not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture.
As a result, public school or other employees who work a 10-month year commencing August 1, 2008 -- but who elect to be paid ratably over 12 months -- could be considered to be participating in an "ineligible" IRC § 457 plan or a non-compliant IRC § 409A plan and, thereby, subject to income tax in 2008 on the portion of their salary that is earned in 2008 but paid in 2009.
The Solution: Special Rule Will Apply
In Notice 2008-62, IRS acknowledged the desire to accommodate such arrangements and not subject them unnecessarily to the strictures of IRC §§ 457(f) or 409A. It advised that regulations under IRC § 457(f) will be issued -- and changes to the regulations under IRC § 409A will be proposed -- to provide that an arrangement in which an employee or independent contractor receives "recurrent part-year compensation" will not be treated as providing deferred compensation as long as it does not:
|
The term "recurrent part-year compensation" is defined under the IRC § 409A as: "compensation paid for services rendered in a position that the service recipient and service provider reasonably anticipate will continue on similar terms and conditions in subsequent years, and will require services to be provided during successive service periods each of which comprises less than 12 months (for example, a teacher providing services during a school year comprised of 10 consecutive months), and each of which periods begins in one taxable year of the service provider and ends in the next such taxable year."
Notice 2008-62 provides the following examples, which serve to illustrate that the special rule will be available except where the employee is very highly paid.
Example 1: |
![]() | The information in this Washington Bulletin is general in nature only and not intended to provide advice or guidance for specific situations.
If you have any questions or need additional information about articles appearing in this or previous versions of Washington Bulletin, please contact: Robert Davis 202.879.3094, Elizabeth Drigotas 202.879.4985, Mary Jones 202.378.5067, Stephen LaGarde 202.879-5608, Erinn Madden 202.572.7677, Bart Massey 202.220.2104, Mark Neilio 202.378.5046, Tom Pevarnik 202.879.5314, Sandra Rolitsky 202.220.2025, Tom Veal 312.946.2595, Deborah Walker 202.879.4955. Copyright 2008, Deloitte. |
BenefitsLink is an independent national employee benefits information provider, not formally affiliated with the firms and companies who kindly provide much of the content and advertisements published on this Web site, including the article shown above. |