Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Defined Benefit Specialist II or III

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Client Service Specialist

EPIC RPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC RPS logo

Distributions Processor - Qualified Retirement Plans

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
(Remote)

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd. logo

Plan Installation Manager

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

Omni Operator

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

Plan Administrator

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC
(Remote)

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC logo

Census Coordinator

BPAS
(Utica NY / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Regional Sales Consultant

The Pension Source
(AL / AR / GA / KY / MS / TN / TX)

The Pension Source logo

Implementation Specialist

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Senior Plan Administrator

Merkley Retirement Consultants
(Remote)

Merkley Retirement Consultants logo

Retirement Combo Plan Administrator

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
(Remote / Commack NY)

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc. logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Guest Article

Deloitte logo

(From the November 10, 2008 issue of Deloitte's Washington Bulletin, a periodic update of legal and regulatory developments relating to Employee Benefits.)

Changes to Federal Income Tax Definition of Dependent Effective in 2009


The Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008 made a number of changes to the IRC § 152 definition of "dependent," effective for taxable year beginning after December 31, 2008. These changes are noteworthy for employers because the IRC § 152 dependent definition forms the basis for determining if employees can cover certain individuals under their employers' group health plans on a tax preferred basis.

Background

A taxpayer may claim someone as a "dependent" for federal income tax purposes only if he or she is the taxpayer's "qualifying child" or "qualifying relative," as defined by IRC § 152. Currently, IRC § 152(c) imposes relationship, residence, age and support requirements in determining whether an individual is a "qualifying child." In terms of the required relationship, a "qualifying child" is a child of the taxpayer or descendent of such a child (or is a brother, sister, stepbrother or stepsister of the taxpayer or a descendent of such a relative). In terms of residence, the "qualifying child" must have the same principal place of abode as the taxpayer for more than one half of the taxable year. In terms of age, the "qualifying child" must be under age 19, or be a student under the age of 24, as of the close of the calendar year. In terms of support, the "qualifying child" must not have provided over half of his or her support for the taxable year.

Summary of Changes to IRC § 152 Dependent Definition

The Adoption Act amends IRC § 152(c) effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2008. It adds the following provisions:

  • Age: the "qualifying child" must be younger than the taxpayer claiming the individual as a qualifying child. This is a new provision.
  • Joint Return: the "qualifying child" must not have filed a joint return (other than for a claim of refund) for the taxable year beginning in the calendar year in which the taxable year of the taxpayer begins. IRC § 152(b) currently prohibits a married individual who files a joint return from being treated as a dependent under IRC § 152, although Revenue Rulings allow such an individual to be treated as a dependent if the reason for the joint return was to obtain a refund and neither the individual nor the spouse would have a tax liability if each filed separately. Revenue Ruling 65-34 and 54-567.
  • Non-Parent Can Claim: where the parents are eligible to claim the individual as "qualifying child" but do not, another taxpayer who is eligible to claim the individual as a "qualifying child" may do so if the taxpayer's adjusted gross income is higher than the highest adjusted gross income of any parent. IRC § 152(c)(4) currently provides that, where both a parent and a non-parent can claim the same individual as a "qualifying child," the individual is treated as the "qualifying child" of the parent.

Therefore, effective in 2009, where the individual is older than the taxpayer, the taxpayer may no longer claim the individual as a "qualifying child" dependent. Also effective in 2009, a non-parent (e.g., grandparent, aunt, or uncle) may claim an individual as a "qualifying child" if the parents do not and the non-parent's adjusted gross income is higher than that of either parent. Along the same lines, beginning in 2009, a married individual who files a joint return only for a claim of refund may constitute a "qualifying child" if the other requirements of IRC § 152(c) are met.

Where the requirements of "qualifying child" are not met, IRC § 152(d) provides a definition of "qualifying relative" by which the dependency exemption may still be claimed by the taxpayer. Generally, the exemption is available with respect to a relative whose gross income is less than the exemption amount and for whom the taxpayer provided more than half the support for the year. Therefore, where the individual is older than the taxpayer, the dependency exemption may still be available after 2008 if the individual's gross income is less than the exemption amount and the taxpayer provided more than half of the individual's support for the year.


Deloitte logoThe information in this Washington Bulletin is general in nature only and not intended to provide advice or guidance for specific situations.

If you have any questions or need additional information about articles appearing in this or previous versions of Washington Bulletin, please contact: Robert Davis 202.879.3094, Elizabeth Drigotas 202.879.4985, Mary Jones 202.378.5067, Stephen LaGarde 202.879-5608, Erinn Madden 202.572.7677, Bart Massey 202.220.2104, Mark Neilio 202.378.5046, Tom Pevarnik 202.879.5314, Sandra Rolitsky 202.220.2025, Tom Veal 312.946.2595, Deborah Walker 202.879.4955.

Copyright 2008, Deloitte.


BenefitsLink is an independent national employee benefits information provider, not formally affiliated with the firms and companies who kindly provide much of the content and advertisements published on this Web site, including the article shown above.