Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Relationship Manager

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Urbandale IA / Hybrid)

Retirement Plan Consultants logo

Managing Director - Operations, Benefits

Daybright Financial
(Remote / CT / MA / NJ / NY / PA / Hybrid)

Daybright Financial logo

Relationship Manager

Compass
(Remote / Stratham NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

Plan Consultant

BPAS
(Remote / Utica NY / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Cash Balance/ Defined Benefit Plan Administrator

Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC
(Remote / NJ)

Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC logo

Plan Consultant

BPAS
(Utica NY / PA / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Mergers & Acquisition Specialist

Compass
(Remote / Stratham NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

DC Retirement Plan Administrator

Michigan Pension & Actuarial Services, LLC
(Farmington MI / Hybrid)

Michigan Pension & Actuarial Services, LLC logo

3(16) Fiduciary Analyst

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions logo

Regional Vice President, Sales

MAP Retirement USA LLC
(Remote)

MAP Retirement USA LLC logo

Retirement Plan Administration Consultant

Blue Ridge Associates
(Remote)

Blue Ridge Associates logo

Relationship Manager for Defined Benefit/Cash Balance Plans

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

ESOP Administration Consultant

Blue Ridge Associates
(Remote)

Blue Ridge Associates logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Guest Article

Deloitte logo

(From the December 8, 2008 issue of Deloitte's Washington Bulletin, a periodic update of legal and regulatory developments relating to Employee Benefits.)

IRS Rules: Transferred Surplus DB Assets Can Not Fund Matching Contributions


Final Treasury Regulations under IRC §§ 401(k) & (m) impose new stringent timing requirements on the contribution of matching contributions. Amounts cannot be contributed to fund matching contributions before the employee completes the deferral election or performs the underlying service that relates to the deferral. IRS recently ruled that this timing requirement also applies to the transfer of surplus assets from a terminated defined benefit plan. Transferred surplus assets cannot be used to provide matching contributions if the assets are contributed before the employee completes the deferral election or performs the underlying service. IRS Private Letter Rulings 200836034 & 200836035 (dated June 11, 2008).

Timing Restrictions Apply to Matching Contributions

Recently revised Treasury Regulations under IRC §§ 401(k) and (m) -- which became generally effective for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2006 -- made numerous changes to the rules governing deferrals and matching contributions. Among the changes implemented was a general prohibition against pre-funding deferral and matching contributions. Specifically, employer contributions are not matching contributions if they are contributed:

  • before the cash or deferred election is made,
  • before the employee's performance of services with respect to the election (or when the cash that is subject to the election would be currently available, if earlier), or
  • in the case of matching contributions that are made on employee after-tax contributions, before the employee contribution is made. Treas. Reg. § 1.401(m)-1(a)(2)(iii).

Previously, employers were permitted to contribute amounts to the plan for allocation as matching contributions during the plan year -- and, in fact, were permitted to contribute the amounts before the end of the employer's tax year to be allocated as matching contributions after the close of the tax year but before the end of the overlapping plan year. Notice 2002-48 provided that such contributions would be deductible for the employer's tax year in which the actual contribution was made.

In implementing the new timing requirement, the Preambles to the Treasury Regulations made clear that amounts contributed under Notice 2002-8 would no longer qualify as matching contributions:

IRS and Treasury ... concluded that the prefunding of elective contributions and matching contributions is inconsistent with sections 401(k) and 401(m) and that the restrictions on the timing of contributions are consistent with the fundamental premise of elective contributions (i.e., these are contributions that are paid to the plan as a result of an employee election not to receive those amounts in cash). Accordingly, the final regulations generally provide that contributions are made pursuant to a cash or deferred election only if the contributions are made after the employee's performance of services which relate to the compensation that, but for the election, would have been paid to the employee. ... Thus, an employer is not able to prefund elective contributions in order to accelerate the deductions for elective contributions; and employer contributions made under the facts in Notice 2002-48 (2002-2 C.B. 139) are no longer permitted to be taken into account under the ADP test or ACP test and would not satisfy any plan requirement to provide elective contributions or matching contributions.

Preambles to Treas. Reg. § 1.401(k) & 1.401(m), Treasury Decision 9169, December 28, 2004. (Emphasis added.)

As a result of the revised Treasury Regulations, employers are no longer permitted to contribute amounts to the plan to be allocated as future matching contributions -- even if the contributions are "guaranteed" to be allocated within the current plan year.

Surplus DB Assets Transferred to a 401(k) Plan Run Afoul of the Timing Rule

IRS recently addressed whether surplus assets could be transferred from a terminated defined benefit plan to fund matching contributions under an ongoing 401(k) plan that was a "qualified replacement plan" under IRC § 4980(d). That section imposes a tax on reversions to the employer from a qualified plan. The employer is generally liable for a tax equal to 50 percent of the reversion, but the tax is reduced to 20 percent if the employer first establishes a qualified replacement plan or increases benefits as provided under IRC § 4980(d).

In May 2007, two very similar ruling requests were submitted to IRS. In the requests, the taxpayer proposed to transfer all of the surplus assets from a terminated defined benefit plan to its 401(k) plan, and to hold the assets in a suspense account within the 401(k) plan until they were allocated as employer matching contributions ratably, on a payroll-by-payroll basis, over the 7-plan year period beginning with the year of the transfer as required under IRC § 4980(d). In the alternative, the taxpayer proposed to allocate amounts from the suspense account as employer nonelective contributions ratably, either on a payroll or annual basis, over the 7-year period.

In June 2008, IRS issued Private Letter Rulings 200836034 & 200836035 in which it concluded that the transferred surplus assets could not be allocated as matching contribution consistent with the timing requirement of Treas. Reg. § 1.401(m)-1(a)(2)(iii) if they were transferred to the 401(k) plan before the time designated under the regulations. However, it ruled that the amounts could be allocated as employer nonelective contributions as the taxpayer had alternatively proposed.

Impact

Employers and plan administrators need to be aware of the timing rule imposed under the new Treasury Regulations, and that it applies to transferred surplus assets as well as to "regular" employer contributions made to fund matching contribution under a qualified plan. Amounts that are contributed to a plan before the time permitted for contributing matching contributions will result in those amounts not constituting a true matching contribution (e.g., the amounts will not be taken into account for ADP or ACP discrimination testing, and will not be deemed to satisfy the plan requirement to provide a matching contribution). In addition to possible testing failures, prefunding matching contributions -- and thereby allocating amounts which are not provided under the plan (i.e., which look like matching contributions but are not) -- would also raise qualification issues with the failure to follow "a definite predetermined formula for allocating the contributions" as required under IRC § 401(a).


Deloitte logoThe information in this Washington Bulletin is general in nature only and not intended to provide advice or guidance for specific situations.

If you have any questions or need additional information about articles appearing in this or previous versions of Washington Bulletin, please contact: Robert Davis 202.879.3094, Elizabeth Drigotas 202.879.4985, Mary Jones 202.378.5067, Stephen LaGarde 202.879-5608, Erinn Madden 202.572.7677, Bart Massey 202.220.2104, Mark Neilio 202.378.5046, Tom Pevarnik 202.879.5314, Sandra Rolitsky 202.220.2025, Tom Veal 312.946.2595, Deborah Walker 202.879.4955.

Copyright 2008, Deloitte.


BenefitsLink is an independent national employee benefits information provider, not formally affiliated with the firms and companies who kindly provide much of the content and advertisements published on this Web site, including the article shown above.