Featured Jobs
|
Cash Balance/ Defined Benefit Plan Administrator Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC
|
|
Compass
|
|
ESOP Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
|
Strongpoint Partners
|
|
Mergers & Acquisition Specialist Compass
|
|
Relationship Manager for Defined Benefit/Cash Balance Plans Daybright Financial
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement USA LLC
|
|
Managing Director - Operations, Benefits Daybright Financial
|
|
Retirement Plan Administration Consultant Blue Ridge Associates
|
|
Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
DC Retirement Plan Administrator Michigan Pension & Actuarial Services, LLC
|
|
Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions
|
|
July Business Services
|
|
Combo Retirement Plan Administrator Strongpoint Partners
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
Guest Article
(From the April 27, 2009 issue of Deloitte's Washington Bulletin, a periodic update of legal and regulatory developments relating to Employee Benefits.)
As expected, George Miller (D-CA), Chairman of the House Education & Labor Committee, introduced a bill (H.R. 1984) to impose special reporting and disclosure rules -- focused primarily on investment related fees -- for individual account plans. The bill is similar to one which the Committee approved in April 2008, but has some notable additions, including the requirement that a plan must include at least one low-cost index fund to be eligible for ERISA § 404(c) protection.
Nuts and Bolts of the Proposal
As proposed, the 401(k) Fair Disclosure for Retirement Security Act of 2009 has four basic components.
|
Comments Thus Far
Some commentators have expressed concern with certain aspects of the bill, which they contend may increase costs and/or require more burdensome notices without enhancing the ability of participants to make good investment choices. The requirement for the service provider to allocate its fees among the sub-categories, for example, has been potentially targeted as not adding real value to participants while creating a greater disclosure burden on the service provider. The requirement that the service provider disclose its financial relationships has also been targeted as potentially confusing inasmuch as it requires disclosure even if there is no conflict of interest, and where the prohibited transaction rules are otherwise satisfied. The proposed changes to ERISA § 404(c), by which at least one passively managed index fund must be offered under the plan, has also raised concerns about whether specific investment options should be required by law -- particularly in light of the well-established regulatory structure under ERISA § 404(c) which otherwise requires the selection of a "broad range of investment alternatives" by means of a prudent fiduciary process.
![]() | The information in this Washington Bulletin is general in nature only and not intended to provide advice or guidance for specific situations.
If you have any questions or need additional information about articles appearing in this or previous versions of Washington Bulletin, please contact: Robert Davis 202.879.3094, Elizabeth Drigotas 202.879.4985, Mary Jones 202.378.5067, Stephen LaGarde 202.879-5608, Erinn Madden 202.572.7677, Bart Massey 202.220.2104, Mark Neilio 202.378.5046, Tom Pevarnik 202.879.5314, Sandra Rolitsky 202.220.2025, Tom Veal 312.946.2595, Deborah Walker 202.879.4955. Copyright 2009, Deloitte. |
BenefitsLink is an independent national employee benefits information provider, not formally affiliated with the firms and companies who kindly provide much of the content and advertisements published on this Web site, including the article shown above. |