Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Relationship Manager – Defined Contributions

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Plan Administration Analyst

EPIC RPS
(Remote)

EPIC RPS logo

Senior Client Success Manager

Independent Retirement
(Remote)

Independent Retirement logo

Experienced Employee Benefits Attorney

Shipman & Goodwin LLP
(Hartford CT / Stamford CT / Boston MA / Hybrid)

Shipman & Goodwin LLP logo

Regional Sales Director-Mid Atlantic

July Business Services
(Waco TX / DC)

July Business Services logo

Plan Administrator

Stones River Consulting
(Remote / TN)

Stones River Consulting logo

Director of Regulatory Operations and Compliance

PCS Retirement
(PA / Hybrid)

PCS Retirement logo

Team Leader

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Relationship Manager

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Internal Channel Sales Team Lead

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

Regional Sales Director-Heartland

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX / IL)

July Business Services logo

Consulting Actuary

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Manager of Client Service

EPIC RPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC RPS logo

Consultant / Account Manager

Spectrum Pension Consultants (part of Daybright Financial)
(Remote / Tacoma WA / CA / OH)

Spectrum Pension Consultants (part of Daybright Financial) logo

Director, Strategic Accounts and Channel Development

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Guest Article

Deloitte logo

(From the August 9, 2010 issue of Deloitte's Washington Bulletin, a periodic update of legal and regulatory developments relating to Employee Benefits.)

DHHS Requests Comments on Establishment of State Health Insurance Exchanges


Taking the first step toward issuing guidance on the establishment and operation of the new health insurance exchanges which are required to be up and running under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act by January 1, 2014, the Department of Health and Human Services published a request for comments from interested stakeholders - including the employer community.

Creation of State Exchanges

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act allows each state to establish a health insurance exchange (an "Exchange") to facilitate the purchase of qualified health plans ("QHPs") by individuals and certain employers within the state. For those states that will not have an Exchange operable by January 1, 2014, a Federally-operated Exchange will serve them. The Exchanges will perform myriad functions, including certifying QHPs, maintaining an internet website by which QHPs can be compared, rating QHPs on the basis of quality and price, and enrolling eligible individuals in QHPs.

Facing the enormous task of developing standards for the establishment and operation of the Exchanges, the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) published a request for comments on August 3 to obtain input and consult with "interested stakeholders." The request merits a review by any party potentially interested in commenting on the how the Exchanges will work. It covers a wide swath of areas, including how the DHHS should grant awards to the states to establish the Exchanges, what the implementation tasks and timeframes would be for establishment of the Exchanges (including the information technology needs), what the certification criteria should be for QHPs, how to rate the QHPs on the basis of quality and price, how the Federal Exchange should be established to best serve nonelecting states, and how the Exchanges should conduct enrollment in QHPs (including determining whether individuals are eligible for participation, premium tax credits, cost-sharing reductions and individual responsibility exemptions).

Employer Input Requested

Beginning in 2017, the states will have the option of opening their Exchange to large employers. Before then the Exchanges will be open only to small employers (i.e., with no more than 100 employees). Before 2016, the states have the option of further restricting the availability of their Exchange to even smaller employers (i.e., with nor more than 50 employees).

Beyond the potential opening of the Exchanges to large employers in 2017, with the establishment of the Exchanges in 2014 employers who do not offer affordable coverage will be interacting with the Exchange . including when their employees purchase coverage through the Exchange.

For these reasons, employers may be interested in the design and operation of the Exchanges. Beyond the comments requested otherwise, the DHHS specifically asks employers to identify the:

  • Design features likely to be most important for employer participation in the Exchanges.
  • Important factors in determining the employer size limit (e.g., 50 versus 100) for participation in an Exchange.
  • Important considerations to facilitate coordination between employers and the Exchanges (e.g., the key issues that will require collaboration).

Comments are requested by October 4, 2010.


Deloitte logoThe information in this Washington Bulletin is general in nature only and not intended to provide advice or guidance for specific situations.

If you have any questions or need additional information about articles appearing in this or previous versions of Washington Bulletin, please contact:

Robert Davis 202.879.3094, Elizabeth Drigotas 202.879.4985, Mary Jones 202.378.5067, Stephen LaGarde 202.879-5608, Bart Massey 202.220.2104, Tom Pevarnik 202.879.5314, Sandra Rolitsky 202.220.2025, Deborah Walker 202.879.4955.

Copyright 2010, Deloitte.


BenefitsLink is an independent national employee benefits information provider, not formally affiliated with the firms and companies who kindly provide much of the content and advertisements published on this Web site, including the article shown above.