Featured Jobs
|
Independent Retirement
|
|
Director, Strategic Accounts and Channel Development July Business Services
|
|
Compass
|
|
Experienced Employee Benefits Attorney Shipman & Goodwin LLP
|
|
Attorney - ERISA, Benefits, & PRT Securian Financial Group
|
|
Automotive Industries Trust Funds
|
|
Mergers & Acquisition Specialist Compass
|
|
EPIC RPS
|
|
Relationship Manager – Defined Contributions Daybright Financial
|
|
Internal Channel Sales Team Lead July Business Services
|
|
Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
Regional Sales Director-Heartland July Business Services
|
|
Daybright Financial
|
|
Regional Sales Director-Mid Atlantic July Business Services
|
|
Pentegra
|
|
The Pension Source
|
|
Independent Retirement
|
|
Senior Client Service Specialist EPIC RPS
|
|
Stones River Consulting
|
|
Daybright Financial
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
Guest Article
(From the October 24, 2011 issue of Deloitte's Washington Bulletin, a periodic update of legal and regulatory developments relating to Employee Benefits.)
The IRS released a set of Questions and Answers to supplement Publication 555 Community Property regarding the preparation of Federal income tax returns for same-sex spouses in California and registered domestic partners in California, Nevada and Washington. The Q&As address various topics, including head of household status, claiming children as dependents and claiming adoption credits.
Referring to both same-sex spouses and registered domestic partners as "registered domestic partners" in the Q&A, the release clarifies among other things:
|
No Obligation to File Amended Returns for Tax Years Beginning Before 2010
Are registered domestic partners who filed their Federal income tax returns without regard to community property laws required to file amended returns? The Q&As state that "registered domestic partners who reported community income without regard to community property laws for a taxable year beginning before 2010 are generally not required to amend those returns to report half of the community income."
The release goes on to note that in California registered domestic partners received full community property rights in 2007 and, therefore, they may but are not required to amend their returns for taxable years beginning in 2007, 2008 and 2009. Similarly, in Nevada the community property laws apply to registered domestic partners as of October 1, 2009, so they may but are not required to amend their returns for taxable years beginning in 2009 (to report half of the community income for the period October 1, 2009 to the last day of the partner's tax year). In Washington community property laws apply as of June 12, 2008, so they may but are not required to amend their returns for taxable years beginning in 2009 and in 2008 (to report half of the community income for the period June 12, 2008 to the last day of the partner's tax year).
The Q&As point out that, in any case, if one partner amends his or her return to report one half of the community income the other partner must report the other half. Q&A-19.
![]() | The information in this Washington Bulletin is general in nature only and not intended to provide advice or guidance for specific situations.
If you have any questions or need additional information about articles appearing in this or previous versions of Washington Bulletin, please contact: Robert Davis 202.879.3094, Elizabeth Drigotas 202.879.4985, Mary Jones 202.378.5067, Stephen LaGarde 202.879-5608, Erinn Madden 202.220.2692, Bart Massey 202.220.2104, Tom Pevarnik 202.879.5314, Sandra Rolitsky 202.220.2025, Deborah Walker 202.879.4955. Copyright 2011, Deloitte. |
BenefitsLink is an independent national employee benefits information provider, not formally affiliated with the firms and companies who kindly provide much of the content and advertisements published on this Web site, including the article shown above. |