Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Distribution Reviewer

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

ESOP Consultant

BPAS
(Remote)

BPAS logo

ESOP Administration Consultant

Blue Ridge Associates
(Remote)

Blue Ridge Associates logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Strongpoint Partners
(Remote)

Strongpoint Partners logo

Relationship Manager

Compass
(Remote / Stratham NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

Internal Sales Consultant

EPIC RPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC RPS logo

3(16) Fiduciary Analyst

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions logo

Regional Vice President, Sales

MAP Retirement USA LLC
(Remote)

MAP Retirement USA LLC logo

Managing Director - Operations, Benefits

Daybright Financial
(Remote / CT / MA / NJ / NY / PA / Hybrid)

Daybright Financial logo

DC Retirement Plan Administrator

Michigan Pension & Actuarial Services, LLC
(Farmington MI / Hybrid)

Michigan Pension & Actuarial Services, LLC logo

Relationship Manager

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Urbandale IA / Hybrid)

Retirement Plan Consultants logo

Retirement Plan Administration Consultant

Blue Ridge Associates
(Remote)

Blue Ridge Associates logo

Mergers & Acquisition Specialist

Compass
(Remote / Stratham NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

Combo Retirement Plan Administrator

Strongpoint Partners
(Remote)

Strongpoint Partners logo

Relationship Manager for Defined Benefit/Cash Balance Plans

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Cash Balance/ Defined Benefit Plan Administrator

Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC
(Remote / NJ)

Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Guest Article

Deloitte

(From the May 30, 2006 issue of Deloitte's Washington Bulletin, a periodic update of legal and regulatory developments relating to Employee Benefits.)

IRS Proposed Regulations on Child Care Tax Credit Affect Dependent Care FSAs


The Internal Revenue Service on May 24, 2006 issued proposed regulations on the child care tax credit that also govern benefits that employer-sponsored Dependent Care Assistance Programs (DCAPs) -- including Dependent Care Flexible Spending Arrangements (FSAs) -- can provide. The proposed regulations reflect a series of legislative changes to the relevant rules dating back to 1984. The proposed regulations will not become effective until published in final form, but still offer useful guidance on the IRS's position on certain issues for DCAP sponsors and administrators.

Link Between Child Care Tax Credit and DCAPs

IRC § 129 provides a gross income exclusion of up to $5,000 per year for benefits employers provide pursuant to DCAPs. However, the exclusion applies only to DCAPs -- including Dependent Care FSAs -- that satisfy certain requirements relating to eligibility, nondiscrimination, and notice. In addition, DCAPs may provide only "dependent care assistance," which means "the payment of, or provision of, those services which if paid for by the employee would be considered employment-related expenses under section 21(b)(2) (relating to expenses for household and dependent care services necessary for gainful employment)." IRC § 129(e)(1). Thus, IRC § 21 and the related regulations govern the types of benefits that can be provided under DCAPs, and the types of expenses that Dependent Care FSAs can reimburse.

Employment-Related Expenses

In general, employment-related expenses are expenses for "household services" and expenses for the care of a "qualifying individual," but only to the extent incurred to enable the taxpayer to be "gainfully employed." A "qualifying individual" is any of the following:

  • the taxpayer's dependent (as defined in IRC § 152(a)(1)) who is under age 13; or
  • the taxpayer's spouse or dependent (as defined in IRC § 152, but without regard to subsections (b)(1), (b)(2), and (d)(1)(B)) who is physically or mentally incapable of caring for himself or herself and who has the same principal place of abode as the taxpayer for more than one-half of such taxable year.

According to the proposed regulations, "An individual is physically or mentally incapable of self-care if, as a result of a physical or mental defect, the individual is incapable of caring for the individual's hygiene or nutritional needs, or requires full-time attention of another person for the individual's own safety or the safety of others." The fact the individual cannot engage in any "substantial gainful activity" or perform the "normal household functions of a homemaker or care for minor children" because of a mental or physical condition is not enough.

Significantly, qualifying individual status is determined on a daily basis. Thus, for example, if the taxpayer's dependent child turns 13 on July 1, 200X, then s/he is a qualifying individual only from January 1 through June 30, 200X.

Employment-related expenses specifically do not include the cost of sending a qualifying individual to an overnight camp. Additionally, otherwise eligible expenses incurred for services outside the taxpayer's household -- such as in a "Dependent Care Center" -- count only if incurred for the care of a qualifying individual who is under age 13, or any other qualifying individual who regularly spends at least 8 hours each day in the taxpayer's household. A "Dependent Care Center" is defined as a facility that provides care for more than six non-residents and receives a fee, payment, or grant for providing services to such individuals.

The "Gainfully Employed" Requirement

As noted, expenses are employment-related only if incurred to enable the taxpayer to be "gainfully employed." According to the proposed regulations, the employment might consist of service within or outside the taxpayer's home and includes self-employment. Actively seeking gainful employment also counts, but working as a volunteer or for nominal consideration does not.

Additionally, the fact an expense is incurred while the taxpayer is gainfully employed is not enough. The expense must be incurred to enable the taxpayer to be so employed. This determination is made on a facts and circumstances basis.

As with qualifying individual status, gainful employment is determined on a daily basis. Thus, if the taxpayer incurs expenses for a period during which s/he is gainfully employed (or seeking gainful employment) only part of the time, the expenses must be allocated on a daily basis. However, allocation is not required for short, temporary absences from work, such as for vacations or minor illnesses. Again, this is determined on a facts and circumstances basis.

A special rule applies to part-time employees. As a general matter, they must allocate dependent care expenses for days worked and days not worked. (A day worked is a day on which the taxpayer works at least one hour.) However, if the taxpayer has to pay dependent care expenses on a weekly or monthly basis, including days worked and not worked, the proposed regulations do not require the taxpayer to allocate expenses. The proposed regulations illustrate this special rule with the following examples.

Example 3. D works 3 days per week and her child attends a dependent care center (that complies with all state and local requirements) to enable her to be gainfully employed. The dependent care center allows payment for any 3 days per week for $150 or 5 days per week for $250. D enrolls her child for 5 days per week. Under paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of this section, D must allocate her expenses for dependent care between days worked and days not worked. Three-fifths of the $250, or $150 per week, may be an employment-related expense under section 21.

Example 4. The facts are the same as in Example 3, except that the dependent care center does not offer the 3-day option. The entire $250 weekly fee may be an employment-related expense under section 21.

Care of a Qualifying Individual and Household Services

In order to be employment-related, expenses must be for the care of a qualifying individual or for household services provided in connection with the care of a qualifying individual. According to the proposed regulations, expenses are for the care of a qualifying individual "if the primary function is to assure the individual's well-being and protection." This does not include amounts paid for food, lodging, clothing, or education. However, if these or other goods and services are "incidental to and inseparably a part of the care, the full amount is for care."

The proposed regulations clarify that taxpayers do not have to choose the least expensive alternative available for providing care in order for the expenses to be employment-related. This is true even if another caregiver is available to the taxpayer at no charge.

Household services are "the performance in and about the taxpayer's home of ordinary and usual services necessary to the maintenance of the household and attributable to the care of the qualifying individual." These do not include services provided by "chauffeurs, bartenders, or gardeners."

In the case of expenses partly for household services or partly for the care of a qualifying individual and partly for other goods or services, a "reasonable allocation" is required. The allocation is not required, however, if the expense for the other purpose is minimal or insignificant.

Specific Expenses

As noted, the IRC specifies that expenses for overnight camps are not employment-related expenses. The proposed regulations clarify that day camps may be employment-related expenses, even if they specialize in a particular activity -- like computers.

Also, the proposed regulations clarify that expenses for sending a child to nursery school or pre-school may be employment-related expenses, but expenses for sending a child to kindergarten or higher grade levels are not. However, before- or after-school care for a qualifying individual in kindergarten or a higher grade may be employment-related expenses.

Finally, the proposed regulations provide guidance on the following specific expenses.

  • Transportation. According to the proposed regulations, transportation to or from a place of care may be for the care of the qualifying individual if provided by the dependent care provider. The cost of transportation provided by anyone else is not for the care of the qualifying individual.
  • Employment taxes. The proposed regulations specify that FICA, FUTA, and similar state payroll taxes are employment-related expenses if paid in respect of wages that are employment-related expenses.
  • Room and board. According to the proposed regulations, the additional cost of providing room and board for a caregiver over usual household expenditures may be an employment-related expense.
  • Indirect expenses. Application fees, agency fees, and deposits may be for the care of a qualifying individual and may be employment-related expenses if the taxpayer is required to pay the expenses to obtain the related care. However, these payments are not employment-related expenses if the care is not provided and they are forfeited.

DeloitteThe information in this Washington Bulletin is general in nature only and not intended to provide advice or guidance for specific situations.

If you have questions or need additional information about articles appearing in this or previous versions of Washington Bulletin, please contact: Robert Davis 202.879.3094, Elizabeth Drigotas 202.879.4985, Taina Edlund 202.879.4956, Laura Edwards 202.879.4981, Mike Haberman 202.879.4963, Stephen LaGarde 202.879-5608, Bart Massey 202.220.2104, Martha Priddy Patterson 202.879.5634, Tom Pevarnik 202.879.5314, Carlisle Toppin 202.220.2067, Tom Veal 312.946.2595, Deborah Walker 202.879.4955.

Copyright 2006, Deloitte.


BenefitsLink is an independent national employee benefits information provider, not formally affiliated with the firms and companies who kindly provide much of the content and advertisements published on this Web site, including the article shown above.