Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Distributions Processor - Qualified Retirement Plans

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC logo

Plan Installation Manager

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

Senior Plan Administrator

Merkley Retirement Consultants
(Remote)

Merkley Retirement Consultants logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
(Remote)

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd. logo

Plan Administrator

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC
(Remote)

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC logo

Defined Benefit Specialist II or III

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Retirement Combo Plan Administrator

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
(Remote / Commack NY)

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc. logo

Implementation Specialist

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Client Service Specialist

EPIC RPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC RPS logo

Regional Sales Consultant

The Pension Source
(AL / AR / GA / KY / MS / TN / TX)

The Pension Source logo

Census Coordinator

BPAS
(Utica NY / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Omni Operator

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Guest Article

Deloitte logo

(From the January 8, 2007 issue of Deloitte's Washington Bulletin, a periodic update of legal and regulatory developments relating to Employee Benefits.)

IRS Seeking Comments on Phased Retirement


During the last decade phased retirement has been oft-cited by policy wonks and policymakers as one option for keeping baby boomers in the workforce a little bit longer. But phased retirement arrangements have not become as prevalent as many thought they might, at least not so far. One reason for this is current IRS regulations that prevent defined benefit plans from making pre-retirement distributions. The IRS took a stab at addressing this problem by issuing proposed regulations on phased retirement in 2004, but critics have called those proposals unworkable. More recently, Congress got involved by amending the Internal Revenue Code to permit pre-retirement distributions from defined benefit plans beginning at age 62. Now the ball is back in the IRS's court, and the agency has issued Notice 2007-8 to solicit comments from interested parties on how to proceed.

According to new IRC § 401(a)(36), as added by the Pension Protection Act (PPA) of 2006 (P.L. 109-280), effective for plan years beginning after December 31, 2006 a pension plan does not fail to satisfy the tax-qualification requirements solely because it allows distributions to employees who are at least 62 years old and still working. The IRS's 2004 proposed regulations, which have not been finalized, would permit plans to make pre-retirement distributions beginning at age 59½ pursuant to a "bona fide phased retirement program." The proposed regulations also include rules for accruing benefits during the phased retirement period, adjusting phased retirement benefits in cases where the employee works more hours than expected, and offsetting the employee's full retirement benefit by any phased retirement benefits paid. Any guidance the IRS issues pursuant to IRC § 401(a)(36) presumably will need to address many of these same issues. The IRS is seeking general comments on what guidance it should issue with respect to IRC § 401(a)(36), as well as on whether it should also issue the 2004 proposals in final form. Additionally, Notice 2007-8 identifies the following specific issues on which the IRS is seeking comments:

  • Should in-service distribution of a benefit to a participant who has attained age 62 but who has not attained normal retirement age be limited to no greater than the benefit to which the participant would be entitled at normal retirement age, reduced in accordance with reasonable actuarial assumptions (e.g., should only unsubsidized benefits be permitted pursuant to IRC § 401(a)(36))?
  • If subsidized benefits are permitted to be distributed to a participant who has attained age 62 but is still in-service and has not yet attained normal retirement age, how should the subsidized benefits be characterized for purposes of IRC § 411?
    • For example, should the subsidized benefits be treated as a subsidized early retirement benefit despite the fact that the participant has not yet separated from employment?
    • If the subsidized benefits are not treated as subsidized early retirement benefits, should the subsidized benefits be treated as part of the participant's accrued benefit, or is there some other characterization of the subsidized benefits for purposes of IRC § 411?
  • Whether final regulations permitting in-service distributions under a bona fide phased retirement program should be issued, in light of the ability of plans to permit in-service distributions after age 62 pursuant to IRC § 401(a)(36)?

Comments must be submitted to IRS by April 16, 2007.


Deloitte logoThe information in this Washington Bulletin is general in nature only and not intended to provide advice or guidance for specific situations.

If you have any questions or need additional information about articles appearing in this or previous versions of Washington Bulletin, please contact: Robert Davis 202.879.3094, Elizabeth Drigotas 202.879.4985, Taina Edlund 202.879.4956, Laura Edwards 202.879.4981, Mike Haberman 202.879.4963, Stephen LaGarde 202.879-5608, Bart Massey 202.220.2104, Martha Priddy Patterson 202.879.5634, Tom Pevarnik 202.879.5314, Tom Veal 312.946.2595, Deborah Walker 202.879.4955.

Copyright 2007, Deloitte.


BenefitsLink is an independent national employee benefits information provider, not formally affiliated with the firms and companies who kindly provide much of the content and advertisements published on this Web site, including the article shown above.