Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Retirement Plan Administration Consultant

Blue Ridge Associates
(Remote)

Blue Ridge Associates logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

Relationship Manager for Defined Benefit/Cash Balance Plans

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

Cash Balance/ Defined Benefit Plan Administrator

Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC
(Remote / NJ)

Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC logo

Combo Retirement Plan Administrator

Strongpoint Partners
(Remote)

Strongpoint Partners logo

Relationship Manager

Compass
(Remote / Stratham NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Strongpoint Partners
(Remote)

Strongpoint Partners logo

ESOP Administration Consultant

Blue Ridge Associates
(Remote)

Blue Ridge Associates logo

Relationship Manager

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Urbandale IA / Hybrid)

Retirement Plan Consultants logo

DC Retirement Plan Administrator

Michigan Pension & Actuarial Services, LLC
(Farmington MI / Hybrid)

Michigan Pension & Actuarial Services, LLC logo

Regional Vice President, Sales

MAP Retirement USA LLC
(Remote)

MAP Retirement USA LLC logo

Mergers & Acquisition Specialist

Compass
(Remote / Stratham NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

3(16) Fiduciary Analyst

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions logo

Managing Director - Operations, Benefits

Daybright Financial
(Remote / CT / MA / NJ / NY / PA / Hybrid)

Daybright Financial logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Guest Article

Deloitte logo

(From the September 10, 2007 issue of Deloitte's Washington Bulletin, a periodic update of legal and regulatory developments relating to Employee Benefits.)

IRS Issues Proposed Regulations on Pension Protection Act's Benefit Limitations for Underfunded Plans


The IRS on August 28, 2007 issued long-awaited proposed regulations on certain of the Pension Protection Act's (PPA) funding-related provisions for single-employer plans. 72 FR 50544 (August 31, 2007). Specifically, these proposed regulations provide guidance on the effect of maintaining and using credit balances to offset minimum funding contributions, applying a series of benefit limitations to certain underfunded plans, and the rules for enrolled actuaries to certify a plan's funded status each year. Even though these provisions generally do not take effect until 2008, the proposed regulations include certain provisions that demand plan sponsors' immediate attention. These provisions are the focus of this article. Future editions of Washington Bulletin will address the rules relating to credit balances (which will become known as "funding standard carryover" and "prefunding" balances when the PPA takes effect) and other aspects of the proposed regulations.

Issues for Immediate Attention

As indicated, the PPA established a series of Benefit Limitations for certain underfunded plans, effective for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2008. These Benefit Limitations, as described by the IRS, are as follows:

  • For a plan with an adjusted funding target attainment percentage (AFTAP) less than 60 percent, a plan must provide that, unless the plan sponsor contributes the amount of the increase in plan liability resulting from the event, plant shutdown and other "unpredictable contingent event," benefits cannot be paid. Similarly, if the AFTAP would be less than 60 percent taking into account the liability for plant shutdown or other unpredictable contingent event benefits, a plan must provide that, unless the plan sponsor contributes an amount to bring the plan back to the 60 percent level, the benefits cannot be paid [IRC § 436(b)].
  • For a plan with an AFTAP below 80 percent, a plan must provide that, unless the plan sponsor contributes the amount of the increase in liability resulting from the plan amendment, an amendment that increases benefit liabilities (e.g., providing new benefits, changing the benefit accrual rate, or improving the vesting schedule) cannot take effect. In addition, if the AFTAP would fall below 80 percent taking into account the increase in liability because of a plan amendment, a plan must provide that, unless the plan sponsor contributes an amount to bring the plan back to the 80 percent level, the amendment cannot take effect [IRC § 436(c)].
  • For a plan with an AFTAP of less than 60 percent, the plan must provide that prohibited payments" (generally, single-sum distributions and other payments that exceed a singlelife annuity payment) cannot be paid; and, unless the plan sponsor contributes the amount needed to bring the plan to the 60 percent level, benefit accruals also must cease [IRC §436(d) and (e)];
  • If a plan is between 60 percent and 80 percent funded, it must provide that a participant may elect to receive part of the benefit as a prohibited payment (with the remaining amounts only payable in a nonaccelerated form).

Generally speaking, these Benefit Limitations apply (or do not apply) during a plan year based on a plan's AFTAP for that plan year, as certified by the plan's Enrolled Actuary (EA). Of course, it generally will not be possible for a plan's EA to certify the AFTAP until sometime after the first day of the plan year. As a result, certain statutory presumptions based on the prior year's AFTAP are used to determine if one or more Benefit Limitations apply until the current year's AFTAP is certified. That is where the 2007 AFTAP comes in.

Presumptions Based on 2007 AFTAP

Calendar-year plans with a certified 2007 AFTAP of at least 90 percent will be in the best shape when the PPA's Benefit Limitations become effective starting January 1, 2008. These plans will not be subject to any Benefit Limitations in 2008 so long as their Eas certify the 2008 AFTAP before October 1, 2008. However, if such a plan's EA does not certify the 2008 AFTAP by this deadline, the plan's 2008 AFTAP will be presumed to be less than 60 percent as of October 1, 2008. This presumption will remain in effect for the rest of the 2008 plan year, even if the plan's EA subsequently certifies the plan's 2008 AFTAP.

If a calendar-year plan's certified 2007 AFTAP is less than 90 percent but at least 80 percent, or less than 70 percent but at least 60 percent, the plan's EA will have to certify the 2008 AFTAP before April 1, 2008 in order to avoid triggering a presumption that the plan's 2008 AFTAP is 10 percentage points less than the 2007 AFTAP, effective on April 1, 2008 and having the plan subject to a restriction that would not otherwise apply. So if the plan's 2007 AFTAP is 85 percent and the EA does not certify the 2008 AFTAP before April 1, 2008, the 2008 AFTAP will be presumed to be 75 percent beginning on April 1, 2008. This will result in the plan being subject to the restriction on amendments increasing benefits and partial limitations on paying lump sums and other accelerated distributions. The presumption will continue until the EA certifies the plan's 2008 AFTAP or October 1, 2008, whichever comes first.

Do Plans Have to Have a Certified 2007 AFTAP?

What happens if a plan's EA does not certify the 2007 AFTAP before the beginning of the 2008 plan year? According to the proposed regulations, in this case the plan's 2007 AFTAP will be presumed to be less than 60 percent until the 2007 AFTAP or 2008AFTAP is certified. If this presumption applies, the limitations on paying shutdown benefits and on plan amendments increasing benefit liabilities will apply as of January 1, 2008 (assuming a calendar year plan). The limitations on paying lump sums and future benefit accruals will begin to apply on April 1, 2008 unless the plan's EA certifies the 2007 or 2008 AFTAP before that date.

Calculating the 2007 AFTAP

The proposed regulations also provide guidance on calculating the 2007 AFTAP. Basically, the proposed regulations require plans to use modified versions of the 2007 current liability and actuarial value of plan assets for this purpose. Both the current liability and actuarial value of plan assets must be increased by aggregate annuity purchases for non-highly compensated employees during the preceding two plan years. Also, the actuarial value of plan assets must be at least 90, but no more than 110, percentof their fair market value. Finally, plan asset values may have to be reduced by any funding standard account credit balance the plan carried as of the 2007 valuation date.

The proposed regulations give plan sponsors some flexibility to improve their 2007 AFTAPs if necessary. Options include making larger plan contributions for the 2006 and/or 2007 plan years and waiving some or all of the plan's funding standard carryover balance as of January 1, 2008.


Deloitte logoThe information in this Washington Bulletin is general in nature only and not intended to provide advice or guidance for specific situations.

If you have any questions or need additional information about articles appearing in this or previous versions of Washington Bulletin, please contact: Robert Davis 202.879.3094, Elizabeth Drigotas 202.879.4985, Taina Edlund 202.879.4956, Mike Haberman 202.879.4963, Stephen LaGarde 202.879-5608, Erinn Madden 202.572.7677, Bart Massey 202.220.2104, Martha Priddy Patterson 202.879.5634, Tom Pevarnik 202.879.5314, Tom Veal 312.946.2595, Deborah Walker 202.879.4955.

Copyright 2007, Deloitte.


BenefitsLink is an independent national employee benefits information provider, not formally affiliated with the firms and companies who kindly provide much of the content and advertisements published on this Web site, including the article shown above.