Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Mergers & Acquisition Specialist

Compass
(Remote / Stratham NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

DC Retirement Plan Administrator

Michigan Pension & Actuarial Services, LLC
(Farmington MI / Hybrid)

Michigan Pension & Actuarial Services, LLC logo

Plan Consultant

BPAS
(Utica NY / PA / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

ESOP Administration Consultant

Blue Ridge Associates
(Remote)

Blue Ridge Associates logo

DB Account Manager

Pentegra
(Remote)

Pentegra logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

Relationship Manager

Compass
(Remote / Stratham NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

Retirement Plan Administration Consultant

Blue Ridge Associates
(Remote)

Blue Ridge Associates logo

Cash Balance/ Defined Benefit Plan Administrator

Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC
(Remote / NJ)

Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC logo

Plan Consultant

BPAS
(Remote / Utica NY / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Relationship Manager

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Urbandale IA / Hybrid)

Retirement Plan Consultants logo

Managing Director - Operations, Benefits

Daybright Financial
(Remote / CT / MA / NJ / NY / PA / Hybrid)

Daybright Financial logo

Regional Vice President, Sales

MAP Retirement USA LLC
(Remote)

MAP Retirement USA LLC logo

3(16) Fiduciary Analyst

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions logo

Relationship Manager for Defined Benefit/Cash Balance Plans

Daybright Financial
(Remote)

Daybright Financial logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Guest Article

Deloitte logo

(From the September 17, 2007 issue of Deloitte's Washington Bulletin, a periodic update of legal and regulatory developments relating to Employee Benefits.)

DOL Releases Defined Contribution Plans from "Safest Annuity Available" Standard


Responding to a statutory mandate, the Department of Labor on September 11, 2007 announced new rules intended to make annuities a more appealing benefit distribution option for 401(k) and other defined contribution plans. An oft-cited obstacle to defined contribution plans offering annuity options is the DOL's "safest annuity available" rule, which has been applied both to defined benefit and defined contribution plans. However, the Pension Protection Act ("PPA") of 2006 (P.L. 109-280) directed DOL to amend its guidance to clarify the "safest annuity available" rule does not apply to defined contribution plans. The DOL on September 12, 2007 issued interim final rules (72 FR 52004) to satisfy this mandate, as well as a proposed safe harbor for defined contribution plan fiduciaries to follow when selecting annuity providers and contracts (72 FR 52022).

Background

The DOL in 1995 issued Interpretive Bulletin 95-1 to provide guidance on applying ERISA's fiduciary standards to selecting annuity providers. According to the Interpretive Bulletin, "... fiduciaries choosing an annuity provider for the purpose of making a benefit distribution must take steps calculated to obtain the safest annuity available, unless under the circumstances it would be in the interests of participants and beneficiaries to do otherwise." The Interpretive Bulletin appears to be directed towards defined benefit plans, but DOL Advisory Opinion 2002-14A explained the same fiduciary principles apply to defined contribution plan fiduciaries when selecting annuity providers.

ERISA requires defined benefit plans to offer an annuity as the default form of distribution. Defined contribution plans may offer an annuity as an optional form of benefit, but are not required to do so. Many defined contribution plans do not offer an annuity option, which has become a point of concern for many policymakers who worry about retirees outliving their savings. The "safest annuity available" standard almost certainly is a reason defined contribution plans do not offer annuities, but it is not the only reason. Still, Congress apparently concluded it is enough of a reason to justify addressing the issue in the PPA.

Specifically, PPA § 625 directs DOL to "... issue final regulations clarifying that the selection of an annuity contract as an optional form of distribution from an individual account plan to a participant or beneficiary --

  • (1) is not subject to the safest available annuity standard under Interpretive Bulletin 95-1 (29 C.F.R. 2509.95-1), and

  • (2) is subject to all otherwise applicable fiduciary standards."

The statutory deadline was August 17, 2007, the one year anniversary of the PPA's enactment.

DOL Action

The DOL's interim final rule satisfies the PPA's first requirement by amending Interpretive Bulletin 95-1 to specify that it applies only "... to the selection of an annuity provider for the purpose of benefit distributions from a defined benefit pension plan ... when the pension plan intends to transfer liability for benefits to an annuity provider." This change is effective beginning November 13, 2007.

The DOL's proposed regulations would satisfy the PPA's second requirement by stating defined contribution plan fiduciaries must satisfy the ERISA § 404(a)(1) fiduciary standards when selecting annuity providers "... in connection with a benefit distribution, or a benefit distribution option made available to participants and beneficiaries under the plan." As summarized by the proposed regulations, ERISA § 404(a)(1)(A) requires fiduciaries to "... discharge their duties with respect to the plan solely in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries" and to "act for the exclusive purpose of providing benefits to the participants and beneficiaries and defraying reasonable plan administration expenses." Additionally, ERISA § 404(a)(1)(B) states fiduciaries must "act with the care, skill, prudence and diligence under the prevailing circumstances that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use."

But the proposed regulations would go farther than merely summarizing the basic fiduciary standards and reasserting those standards apply when a defined contribution plan fiduciary is selecting an annuity provider and purchasing an annuity, which has never been in question. The proposed regulations also would establish a safe harbor defined contribution plan fiduciaries could use to satisfy ERISA § 404(a)(1)(B) in these circumstances. This proposed safe harbor would be available if the fiduciary:

  • (i) Engages in an objective, thorough and analytical search for the purpose of identifying and selecting providers from which to purchase annuities;

  • (ii) Appropriately determines either that the fiduciary had, at the time of the selection, the appropriate expertise to evaluate the selection or that the advice of a qualified, independent expert was necessary;

  • (iii) Gives appropriate consideration to information sufficient to assess the ability of the annuity provider to make all future payments under the annuity contract;

  • (iv) Appropriately considers the cost of the annuity contract in relation to the benefits and administrative services to be provided under such contract;

  • (v) Appropriately concludes that, at the time of the selection, the annuity provider is financially able to make all future payments under the annuity contract and the cost of the annuity contract is reasonable in relation to the benefits and services to be provided under the contract; and

  • (vi) In the case of an annuity provider selected to provide multiple contracts over time, periodically reviews the appropriateness of the conclusion described in paragraph (v), above, taking into account the factors described in paragraphs (iii) and (iv). For purposes of this paragraph (vi), a fiduciary is not required to review the appropriateness of an annuity provider with respect to an annuity contract purchased for an individual participant or beneficiary.

For purposes of meeting the requirements of paragraphs (iii) and (iv), the fiduciary must consider information pertaining to the following:

  • (i) The ability of the annuity provider to administer the payments of benefits under the annuity to the participants and beneficiaries and to perform any other services in connection with the annuity, if applicable;

  • (ii) The cost of the annuity contract in relation to the benefits and administrative services to be provided under such contract, taking into account the amount and nature of any fees and commissions;

  • (iii) The annuity provider's experience and financial expertise in providing annuities of the type being selected or offered;

  • (iv) The annuity provider's level of capital, surplus and reserves available to make payments under the annuity contract;

  • (v) The annuity provider's ratings by insurance ratings services. Consideration should be given to whether an annuity provider's ratings demonstrate or raise questions regarding the provider's ability to make future payments under the annuity contract;

  • (vi) The structure of the annuity contract and benefit guarantees provided, and the use of separate accounts to underwrite the provider's benefit obligations;

  • (vii) The availability and extent of additional protection through state guaranty associations; and

  • (viii) Any other information that the fiduciary knows or should know would be relevant to evaluating the annuity provider's ability to make all future payments and the relationship between the costs and the benefit and administrative services to be provided under the annuity contract.

Effective Dates

As noted, the interim final rules are effective beginning November 13, 2007. The proposed regulations would become effective 60 days after being published in final form in the Federal Register. The DOL is accepting comments on both the interim final rules and the proposed regulations until November 13, 2007.


Deloitte logoThe information in this Washington Bulletin is general in nature only and not intended to provide advice or guidance for specific situations.

If you have any questions or need additional information about articles appearing in this or previous versions of Washington Bulletin, please contact: Robert Davis 202.879.3094, Elizabeth Drigotas 202.879.4985, Taina Edlund 202.879.4956, Mike Haberman 202.879.4963, Stephen LaGarde 202.879-5608, Erinn Madden 202.572.7677, Bart Massey 202.220.2104, Martha Priddy Patterson 202.879.5634, Tom Pevarnik 202.879.5314, Tom Veal 312.946.2595, Deborah Walker 202.879.4955.

Copyright 2007, Deloitte.


BenefitsLink is an independent national employee benefits information provider, not formally affiliated with the firms and companies who kindly provide much of the content and advertisements published on this Web site, including the article shown above.