KIP KRAUS Posted March 7, 2000 Posted March 7, 2000 This may be common knowledge, but I've never had this cituation before. Employee was hourly paid and participating in Union Hourly 401(k) plan. He subsequently becomes exempt salaried employee with the same employer and is now only eligible to participate in the Salaried 401(k)Plan. Can he be given the option to roll over his Union 401 account to the Salaried 401 (k)Plan, or is this not permitted by regs.? If not, can we still allow him to borrow from the Union Plan?
John A Posted March 7, 2000 Posted March 7, 2000 I believe it is clear that the change does not constitute a separation from service, so I do not believe the transer could be a rollover. I had looked at this issue one other time and came to the following conclusions: 1)there can be trustee-to-trustee transfers between the plans, 2) it would be highly preferable for both plan documents to specifically allow trustee-to-trustee transfers, but it is probably not essential, 3)various rights such as methods of distribution would have to be preserved for the transferred money, 4)if the transfer is not in cash, the plan documents would need to provide for in-kind transfers and the receiving plan would have to allow for the type of asset transferred. I'd still be interested in other opinions on this. [This message has been edited by John A (edited 03-07-2000).]
KIP KRAUS Posted March 8, 2000 Author Posted March 8, 2000 John A: Thanks. I suspected that this topic may have been discussed before.
Jon Chambers Posted March 10, 2000 Posted March 10, 2000 I have numerous clients that routinely use the trust-to-trust transfer approach. In most situations, the hourly and salaried plans have the same trustee and same investment options, so it's possible to do an in-kind transfer of fund shares, and avoid being out of the market. ------------------ Jon C. Chambers Principal Schultz Collins Lawson Chambers, Inc. (415) 291-3004 Jon C. Chambers Schultz Collins Lawson Chambers, Inc. Investment Consultants
Guest Posted March 11, 2000 Posted March 11, 2000 A trust-to-trust transfer is certainly an option but don't forget that you need to comply with section 411(d)(6) and you must protect optional forms of benefit. This is frequently a problem . . .
Guest mo again Posted October 10, 2000 Posted October 10, 2000 John A, the link in your message doesn't work any more. Anything you can do to point me toward it? We have had this issue come up recently.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now