Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/29/2015 in all forums

  1. Thanks ETA Consulting. They are basing it on the fact that they don't want to pay $350 for the amendment...!
    1 point
  2. It's not a major show stopper; especially since the EIN has not changed. Can't think of why they wouldn't want to change it. Consistency is good. What are they basing their objection on? Good Luck!
    1 point
  3. Mike Preston

    restructuring

    Let me split hairs. You need to satisfy the gateway rules if you end up testing at least one component plan using cross-testing. 99 and 99/100% of the time that will mean everybody is entitled to the gateway. If I spent enough time I could conjure up a census where using two component plans, one of which is tested on the basis of contributions without permitted disparity and the other of which is tested on the basis of contributions with permitted disparity, is called for. In that case, no gateway would be required.
    1 point
  4. Which is why I said "So long as the Company passes a resolution, or a partnership agreement" that it is acceptable....
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use