The one I had just said no distributions period without spousal consent. You know, trying to prevent the dirt bag spouse from running out on the stay-at-home-with-the-kids-spouse, drains the 401k and blows the money in Vegas. Tale as old as time basically. Gee I wonder where plan sponsors got the idea to make that a requirement? Hmm... Oh I know, probably from the existing laws that make that a requirement for pension plan distributions. Yeah that's a strong possibility.
Oh I know you're going to say. It's not the same thing at all. The spouse is waiving their right to a QJSA! Oh please. Has anyone actually seen someone take an annuity out of a 401k plan? Ever? I've been at this for near 20 years and never seen it once. The reality is that the spouse needs to approve the spouse taking their money as a lump-sum. Even a loan! That's just reality. So really, the argument that in a non-J&S plan suddenly the very same requirement with the very same purpose is now an outrage and will probably result in a gynormous lawsuit and a DOL investigation to boot is a bit hard to imagine.