Whether it is advisable depends upon the owners' overall financial situation.
It is permissible in this case because the participants, plan sponsor, and plan administrator (i.e., the owners who fill all of these fiduciary roles) can decide this is a sound investment for themselves. They certainly could diversify if they wish, but are not required to diversify.
If you have access, check out Session 301 Advanced 415 Limits from the 2013 EA meeting, specifically slides 39-61. There is a good discussion and several examples that might help.
It's not a simple answer.
maybe, if you demonstrate the compliancewith (a)(26) using annual method, then, yes, there is an issue. If you can demonstrate compliance with (a)(26) using accrued to-date method, then it is OK (quite often it works for the year of plan termination).
IRS Notice 2024-80
401(k) deferral limit increases to $23,500
415 limit for DC plans increases to $70,000
HCE threshold increases to $160,000; Key employee at $230,000
401(a)(17) limit increases to $350,000
The plan has to be in compliance with all laws and regs when terminating. If they haven’t signed an up to date termination package, they shouldn’t terminate.
Well I received this message from customer support who was clearly copy/pasting. I probably don't have enough leverage to get to the senior exec who provided that message.