Jump to content

    Cross Tested DB

    goldtpa
    By goldtpa,

    Doing some wotk for a new DB plan. Plan is cross tested.

    Normal Retirement Benefit is % of Avg Mo Comp multiplied by Yrs of Serv limited to a max of 10 yrs.

    The problem we are having is that each employee has a stated %.

    NCHE1 gets 0% of Avg Mo Comp

    NHCE2 gets 2% of Avg Mo Comp

    NHCE3 gets 6% of Avg Mo Comp

    HCE1 gets 6% of Avg Mo Comp

    HCE 2&3 get 0% of Avg Mo Comp

    Can you state a different percentage for each ee?

    We usually do it by classification (i.e all owners get x% all NCHEs get y%)


    safe harbor plan design

    Guest Betsy Oakey
    By Guest Betsy Oakey,

    I have a client with a 401k/ps plan established currently as a ps safe harbor plan design. Can we change it, as of 1/1/07 to a safe harbor match design?


    Avg participation rates with various matching formulas

    Guest mrjones
    By Guest mrjones,

    Does anybody know of a source to consult for average rates of participation for plans with various matching contribution formulas? Broken down by compensation level would be ideal....

    Thanks!


    Treas.Reg. 1.410(b)-5(d)(3)(ii)

    Guest Paula G.
    By Guest Paula G.,

    Facts: Plan A's year ends 1/31/06; Plan B's year ends 12/31/06

    Both plans must be tested for coverage on a controlled-group basis for the plan years ending in 2006. Plan A is maintained by one member of the controlled group and Plan B is maintained by another member of the controlled group. Both plans are 401(k) plans.

    Question: Plan A fails the ratio test on a controlled group basis for the year ended 1/31/06. The TPA wants to perform the average benefits test. What data should the TPA use for the ABR testing group with respect to Plan B? Can it use the 12/31/05 benefit percentages, given the fact that the plans's year has not yet ended for 2006?


    Which tax form to use

    Guest RJMOB
    By Guest RJMOB,

    Plan XYZ is a 'Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan' (SERP) which we

    think is a 457(f) non-qualified plan. Participant F is retiring. The

    Plan Sponsor is purchasing an annuity to fund Participant F's payout.

    ----------------------------

    Specific Questions:

    ----------------------------

    Q1-What tax form, if any should be used to report the purchase of the

    annuity?

    Q2-What tax form should be used to report the annuity payments?

    :blink:


    CDSC Treated as a Plan Expense

    DTH
    By DTH,

    I have a plan that is transferring from one insurer to another. The insurer's contract has a surrender charge for leaving before five years. Can the CDSC be treated as plan expense and be paid by forfeitures and/or the plan sponsor?


    New or Successor Plan II

    Nate X
    By Nate X,

    I'd like to follow-up with a question recently asked since I have a similar situation as this one:

    http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=32782

    ------------------------------------

    A large calendar year plan was part of an ME plan with Paychecks. The client stops participation in the ME plan in April 2006 and assets are moved to another provider in May 2006. The document is restated effective 3/1/06.

    1. Do you agree that this is a continuation of the plan and not a New or Successor plan?

    Assuming it is a continuation,

    2. On Form 5500, would the Beginning of the Year assets be shown on the form, or would they be listed under “Transfers of Assets”?

    3. What is my beginning date for filing Form 5500? (1) The document restatement date, (2) the date the client starts participation with the new provider, or (3) the plan year beginning date?

    4. Would participants that had been previously reported on Sch SSA under the ME plan needed to be added using code C?

    Thanks!


    457

    Guest Brian0925
    By Guest Brian0925,

    Is a charter school eligible to sponsor a gov't 457(b)


    Determination letter filing deadline

    Belgarath
    By Belgarath,

    Having a little debate on a takeover plan. I'm always willing to believe I'm wrong, so here goes.

    The plan is new for 2005 - calendar year plan and fiscal year. It is a DB plan, based upon an approved VS document, but using a modified compensation definition that makes it fall outside of the safe harbors and the current VS language, so we are requiring that they submit for a determination letter as a condition of our performing TPA services.

    As I read the RP 2005-66, this falls under the 5 year individually designed plan deadlines, which are dependent upon the last digit of the EIN. So let's just suppose it is 7. This would be "Cycle B" and therefore must be filed by 1-31-2008.

    Filing currently (this year) on an "off cycle" is an option, but I don't find any specific deadline for this, since an off cycle filing is voluntary.

    Any disagreement? I guess as a further question, do you see any benefit here to a current off cycle filing? I can't see any other than perhaps getting a quicker response. But the RP specifies that off cycle filings will only be reviewed once ALL on cycle filings have been reviewed and processed, so it could actually take longer than waiting. Maybe I'm missing some important point.

    Thanks in advance.


    PBGC Electronic filing

    Guest Grant
    By Guest Grant,

    Has anyone tried the new E-filing? We can't decide which method to use/try.


    Profit Sharing Offset

    rlb64
    By rlb64,

    Client contributes 7.5% profit sharing to NHCE's and around 12% for certain HCE's. They wish to add a safe harbor match to remove adp testing, but they still want everyone to have at least 7.5% total employer contributions. They through out the idea of the profit sharing offset by safe harbor matching contributions.

    Any suggestions?


    PBGC penalty waivers-experiences of others

    AndyH
    By AndyH,

    Looking for help with dealing with PBGC penalty assessment-experiences of others.

    This is the same problem takeover case I have posted about before-actually one of several.

    Sponsor did not file PBGC premiums for several years; service provider never informed sponsor of the continued responsibility after plan was frozen and never completed the forms. Service provider admits guilt and responsibility but has no money to go after.

    New TPA completes and sponsor files four years of forms and PBGC sends penalty and interest notice. Sponsor files a request for reconsideration. PBGC responds by waiving 40% of penalties for last 3 years (no interest waiver-they claim they cannot do that). No waiver is granted for 2002, the first non-filing year. Assessment was 100% of premium plus interest. This is the year the PBGC sent a letter that was not responded to timely. It is what awoke the sponsor to the issue and fired the service provider.

    Question is: Is a 40% penalty waiver following normal TSL and request for reconsideration high, low, or similar to the experiences of others? Should they file another appeal or pay it?


    Section 127 Educational Assistance Program

    Guest crs
    By Guest crs,

    Is a governmental employer that sponsors a Section 127 plan subject to the discrimination rules under Section 127, namely Section 410(b)? Section 410© states that Section 410(b) doesn't apply to a governmental plan, which would apply in the case of a retirement plan but its not clear whether the exclusion would apply in the case of a welfare plan such as a Section 127 plan. I would appreciate anyone's thoughts.


    FreeERISA.com

    Guest Grumpy456
    By Guest Grumpy456,

    Does anyone know where the freeerisa.com website obtains its 5500 information? They charge for "older filings" but if they can get them somewhere, we should be able to as well. Thanks!


    Reporting Asset Reversion

    Guest ak
    By Guest ak,

    When there is a reversion of surplus assets to a noncorporate entity, does the reversion have to be reported by the distributing entity, e.g., trustee, to the IRS, e.g., on a form 1099, or is the only reporting that applies the Form 5330 and Form 5500 reporting?


    Lawyer Lien on Third Party Liability Reimbursement for Medical Claim

    Guest ssk
    By Guest ssk,

    Has anyone heard of a Lawyers Lien on a Third Party Liability Reimbursment for a Medical Claim? So instead of reimbursing the plan for the full medical expenses which were paid on behalf of the claimant, they want to reduce that amount by one third for a lawyers lien. How is the plan made whole in this case? Please advise.


    Can't Use CEBS designation on business cards?

    Guest 401kLady
    By Guest 401kLady,

    I just finished the CEBS program (yeah!) and just found out that our company doesn't permit the use of professional designations on business cards. Some how, I've totally missed this policy and am a bit surprised. PLEASE tell me if your company/firm has the same policy. And the reason why? I can only think it's to limit liability... heavens knows we don't want me flaunting my excessive knowledge of compensation policies and practices. ;)

    Thank you!


    Allocation Rates

    Guest Golden401k
    By Guest Golden401k,

    Background: 4 related employers on one non-stand document. Each employers profit sharing contribution goes only to employees employed by that entity.

    In a situation where only one employer makes a 3% pro-rata profit sharing contribution, would I consider the other employers allocation rates at 0% and still need to rate group test/average benefit test or would the coverage test take care of this because they are not benefiting. Is the formula still deemed uniform? My initial thought is NO, and must perform 401(a)(4) testing.


    Premiums for Individual Plans Pre-taxed Under Section125

    Guest mander
    By Guest mander,

    What are the pros and cons about allowing employees to pay for individual insurance products like cancer and accident policies by pre-taxing the premium through the Section 125 plan? I have heard that if this is done it could create a liability under ERISA.

    Thanks


    Once An Eagle

    Guest Texas_Acty
    By Guest Texas_Acty,

    This is the name of a novel published in 1968, and made into a TV miniseries that was broadcast in December, 1976-January, 1977.

    The book is a favorite of US Army and Marine Corps officers, and is required reading at West Point and other military schools, I believe. It's also a favorite of this former enlisted man, and I'm sure a lot of others.

    Inexplicably, the film has never been available on VHS/DVD. (You would think with the 'crap' that's out on DVD, a fine film like OAE would have been out long ago.) How many former officers and enlisted men in the US? I've got to believe the DVD would sell, millions maybe?

    I want to do my part to get this film released on DVD. I'm going to send a letter (to Universal Home Video, the owner) urging "Get this film out on DVD!!" and register to vote for release of OAE on DVD at this link:

    http://www.tvshowsondvd.com/showinfo.cfm?showID=5424

    Any others who know and enjoyed this fine story do likewise.-Thanks


Portal by DevFuse · Based on IP.Board Portal by IPS
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use