- 47 replies
- 8,297 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,756 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,768 views
- Add Reply
- 2 replies
- 1,866 views
- Add Reply
- 5 replies
- 1,606 views
- Add Reply
- 2 replies
- 1,743 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 1,393 views
- Add Reply
- 5 replies
- 2,061 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,510 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 1,423 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 1,714 views
- Add Reply
- 5 replies
- 1,735 views
- Add Reply
- 4 replies
- 3,376 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 2,579 views
- Add Reply
- 9 replies
- 6,857 views
- Add Reply
- 3 replies
- 1,753 views
- Add Reply
- 4 replies
- 3,928 views
- Add Reply
- 22 replies
- 4,792 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 1,347 views
- Add Reply
- 5 replies
- 3,115 views
- Add Reply
Who gets a 5% contribution?
Under the minimum contribution gateway test in the final regulations, NHCEs must receive a 5% minimum allocation if the plan is to be allowed to cross test. The preamble makes clear that an NHCE is a kind of "employee," and that an individual is an "employee" only if, among other things, the individual is "benefiting" under the plan. Are employees who get a top heavy contribution of 3%, but no other contribution (because, for example, they do not have 1000 hours of service during the plan year) considered to be "benefiting," and thus must receive a 5% contribution in order for the plan to cross test?
Deficit Reduction Contribution
Is the Deficit Reduction Contribution of IRC 412(l) subject to pro-ration for a short plan year?
Match Forfeitures
We have a client who added the Safe Harbor feature to their plan effective with the 2000 Plan year. They have chosen the match contribution to satisfy the safe harbor requirement. Prior to the 2000 Plan year they were making match contributions subject to a vesting schedule. Our firm assumed responsibility for this client at the tail end of the 2000 Plan year.
The client had approximately $10,000 in match forfeitures available for use throughout the 2000 Plan year. Their plan document provides for match forfeitures to be used to reduce future match contributions. During the 2000 Plan year, the client used these forfeitures to reduce the amount paid out of their Corporate checking account towards their safe harbor match contribution.
Any thoughts on problems associated with using non-safe harbor forfeitures to reduce the amount paid out of pocket for a safe harbor match contribution? We have always used available forfeitures in this situation to reduce contributions of the same source (match forfeitures from match subject to vesting used to offset future match contributions subject to vesting).
Reimbursement of Computer
I have a participant claiming reimbursement of purchase of a home computer for a child with cerebral palsy.
He has submitted a physician's letter stating the child has limited use of the hands (he cannot turn book pages or write by hand), and the computer assists him in writing and reading.
I could argue that the computer alleviates a physical defect, but am unsure whether this passes the "but-for" rule.
What do you think? Reimburse or not?
Estate Tax
A plan participant dies and his wife is his beneficiary. She rolls his plan money into an IRA. She dies and leaves all monies in an estate (including her IRAs). Her children are the beneficiaries of the estate. Is there anyway to escape the estate taxes to the children?
roth IRA withdrawal and contribution
From reading other posts, I understand that I can withdraw my basis from the roth IRA with no-tax and no-penalty consequence.
Can I later put back my withdrawal?
Example
1999 contribute 2000 to Roth IRA
2000 contribute 2000 to Roth IRA
2001 withdraw 4000 from Roth IRA (tax-free and no-penalty)
Later in 2001, contribute 6000 to roth IRA <-- is this ok?
(6000 is for the 4000 withdrawal plus the 2000 contribution for 2001).
sample leave of absence polices and procedures
Sample leave of absence policies and procedures needed. This includes both paid and unpaid LOA's: FMLA, Personal leaves, a section on company disability policy, etc. This could be e-mailed to my personal e-mail address, which is jabarma@home.com.
termination of benefits with the slightest pretext
My Longterm Disability Co. uses any and every pretext to continue to deny my LTD benefits (wrong date to see IME). (I have received SSDI for years now.)
Is there any recourse, such as bad faith, or non-feasance? Thank you!
Flexible Spending Account
I have had a medical Flexible Spending Account with my company all year. So far I have had about $750 deducted from my checks.
My company was sold 3 months ago with the note that our Flex plan would be transferred to the new company which took over on July 1. Today I received an email saying the transition and transfer did not work so the Flex plan has ended and we would not be able to be reimbursed.
1. Is this legal? they have my money...don't they have to pay me back once I send bills in?
2. There was no pre-notification that this was ending and therefore bills had to be submitted before June 30.
I need some help. Do I have any recourse? This is a large national company. We were a subsidiary of Staples, Inc.
Thanks a lot.
Andrea Rose
Termination of BD plan and start-up of 457
OK guys. I'm young amature and need a little help if you don't mind. I have a city-owned utility that wishes to terminate its DB plan which is over funded by about 66%. Their plan doc states that any excess funding must be proportionately distributed to employees upon plan termination. If they desire, can the city require employees to roll those all distributions to the new 457?
Also I've never terminated or started a new plan. Do I need to get an IRS approval letter to terminate and start-up? How involved is that process?
Thanks everyone!
:confused:
Safe Harbor Hardship Provision
Client's plan using safe harbor language for both the "needs" and the "necessary" tests. Participant A received a hardship withdrawal for purchase of a principal residence approximately one year ago. The plan administrator knows that the money was not used for this purpose. This same participant is again requesting a hardship to purchase a primary residence. The plan administrator is asking for advice here. They do not believe that the withdrawal will be used for this purpose, but since this is a safe harbor hardship provision should they go ahead and approve and not concern themselves?
Thanks
An HMO as the only option
Are there any laws or regulations to make employers have to offer you other Health Insurance options besides an HMO?
Combine IRA Accounts
I have two questions on combining IRA accounts:
1. I have an existing IRA rollover account from a former employer's 401k. I just left my job so I plan to roll my 401k to an IRA rollover account again. Can I just roll it into my existing IRA Rollover account? I know that I should not blend two different accounts together if I plan to roll to my new employer's 401k. But does this rule apply if both of the accounts are 401k.
2. I have a Roth Rollover account which I have paid all the taxes. Can I combine it with my regular Roth account?
Thanks,
Lu
VEBA Administration - is a specialist needed?
I have a new one-person DB plan client who has a VEBA plan. He is not happy with the current VEBA administrator and would prefer that I administer his VEBA along with the DB plan.
I have no VEBA experience, although I have nearly 20 years experience in retirement plan administration. What are the basic elements of VEBA administration? Is it feasible for me to administer the plan, given my experience? If this is not recommended, can anyone recommend someone offering VEBA administration services who does not provide retirement plan services that may compete with me?
One-time irrevocable election
Per The Pension Answer Book:
"an employee's elective contributions are treated as not having been made pursuant to a cash-or-deferred election if they are made pursuant to a one-time irrevocable election by the employee to have a specified amount or percentage of compensation (including no amount of compensation) contributed by the employer to the plan for the duration of the employee's employment."
How does this work?
1. Does the plan document have to address this? What if the plan is silent on the issue? Are there prototypes or volume submitter plans that address this?
2. How would an irrevocable election to contribute be handled by payroll? The same as elective deferral? What about W-2?
3. Can an otherwise safe-harbor PS or 401(k) do this?
4. If the plan is general tested I assume that the irrevocable election is tested as a non-elective contribution. Is this correct?
Here are some specifics: The plan is a safe harbor 401(k) that provides 3% non-elective. The person interested in doing this is a NHCE with compensation of $90,000 (20% election). He wants to make a $20,000 irrevocable annual contribution.
Any help on how to do this would be greatly appreciated. What other issues are there?
Announcement 2001-77
If a 401(k) plan uses a non-standardized prototype document, and the only reason for not using a standardized prototype is that the plan needed to be able to only benefit collectively bargained ee's, am I correct that this plan can rely on the determination letter issued to the prototype sponsor and that the plan need not file for its own determination letter? This plan does not have a "last day rule" for any contribution types. That is how I am interpreting Announcement 2001-77, can anyone verify?
Thank you!
457 conversion to IRA
We are a non-profit organization and are in the process of discontinuing a 457 Plan and switching to an IRA.
The Plan Administrator is saying that funds from the Plan are the property of the Organization and cannot be removed from the Plan until retirement. They are also saying that the funds in the individuals account are the property of the Organization and could be lost if the Organization files bankruptcy or goes out of business with outstanding debts. Most of the funds have been contributed by the employee with some matching funds by the Organization.
Can anyone help with this issue.
Thanks
Ron
EGTRRA: Catch-up Contrib Eligibility
Some of the early analysis of the "catch-up contribution" in EGTRRA indicates participants must first hit the 402(g) limit ($11,000 in 2002) in order to be eligible. However, this would seem inconsistent with the spirit of the law which is to allow *all* employees who are nearing retirement to make additional deferrals.
Take for example an "average" participants who makes $60,000/yr and is deferring at his plan's maximum rate of 15%. If the early analysis is right, this participant will never be able to make the catch-up contributions. Can this be right? Are the catch-up provisions going to end up being a de facto bonus for the higher paid folks only? Or will a plan limit that results in the above circumstance serve as an alternate eligibility trigger?
Thanks in advance for all insights and inputs.
Cole Stevenson
Steelworker Plan
I need to amend a DB plan that covers members of a USW local. The plan has a provision (that I understand is common among USW plans) that provides for a "special pension" as well as a regular pension.
The special pension is a lump-sum equal to 13 weeks of vacation pay less an offset for vacation pay received for the year.
Does anyone know a reason why this "special pension" would not be subject to the QJ&SA rules?
Largest Estate Issues Facing DB and/or DC Plan Participants/Owners?
I am a DC/DB business analyst, and have several clients who are clamoring for estate help, as their sales representatives are not offering much help in this arena. What would you say are the biggest estate challenges and issues with owners of and participants in db/dc plans?Thanks!







