- 0 replies
- 1,308 views
- Add Reply
- 2 replies
- 2,451 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 1,472 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 1,375 views
- Add Reply
- 4 replies
- 1,674 views
- Add Reply
- 3 replies
- 1,555 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,586 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 2,136 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,832 views
- Add Reply
- 9 replies
- 7,653 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 1,652 views
- Add Reply
- 4 replies
- 1,552 views
- Add Reply
- 5 replies
- 1,954 views
- Add Reply
- 7 replies
- 14,710 views
- Add Reply
- 6 replies
- 2,264 views
- Add Reply
- 4 replies
- 1,986 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 4,251 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 1,404 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 2,066 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 2,237 views
- Add Reply
Southern Users group- Next meeting
Aug 6 and 7 (Fri / Sat) in Orlando
includes Dinner at Bergamos (Italian Resteraunt, singing waiters and waitresses)
Fri Aug 6
1:00 Welcome, misc
1:45 - 2:30 ERISA 404© Education Techniques
3:00 - 4:30 Quantech Tips from Tom Poje
6:00 - Dinner at Bergamos
Sat Aug 7 (Corbel Instructor)
8:30 - 10:00 Quantech Defaults
10:15 - 11:45 Transaction Processing
11:45 - 12:15 (Fidelity Resource Select)
12:15 - 1:15 Lunch
1:15 - 2:45 Distribution processing and data entry
3:00 - 4:30 Loan Processing
For more information, contact Maggie Heffernan (770) 641-1429
This meeting is open to all Quantech Users - not just members of the Southern Users Groups!
I'm bringing copies of the Quantech Dirge song, along with my version of the ADP reports for Crystal.
Mid Year Non-discrimination Testing
Since ADP and ACP for eligible highly compensated employees for the current plan year may be determined by reference to the ADP and ACP for eligible nonhighly compensated employees for the preceeding year, is there a valid reason to do mid-year testing?
------------------
Does a 401(h) plan no longer contributed to and is funded thru pensi
My client funds a 401(h) through their Pension plan. They have determined that they will no long contribute to the 401(h) and let it die a natural death. They plan to continue the 401(h) until the plan assets are depleted. Their actuary has told them that they do not need a valuation. Is this correct? Are their any special requirements for disclosure of this situation?
------------------
Is a 401 k plan "self-directed" if plan has 50 mutual funds
In general, what is the definition of "self-directed" investment?
Specific question: A 401(k) plan permits participants to invest in any of 50 different mutual funds.
Can the plan consider these investments "self-directed" and eliminate the 3.28(k) disclosure?
Would the answer change if the plan allowed investments in 100 different funds? 150? 200?
------------------
[This message has been edited by reesbe (edited 06-29-99).]
Documentation for Cross Tested Plan
What provisions of a Plan Document need to be amended to convert a Profit Sharing Document with a Comp to Comp allocation (Regional Proto-type) to a Cross Tested with an allocation formula based on rate groups? I do understand that by doing so you have created an individually designed document subject to higher user fees for submission.
COBRA & HIPPA
I'm new to health insurance adminstration and need information on COBRA and HIPPA. Where can I get information outlining all the specifics?
Are 401(k) Assets Distributable in these Transactions?
I. Company B is a wholly owned subsidiary of Company A. 401(k) plan (Plan 2) covers only employees of Company B. However, less than 2% of Company B employees are eligible in Company A's 401(k) (Plan 1), but all other Company B employees are covered by Plan 2. Ten percent of Company B's employees (all of whom are eligible only for Plan 2) will be terminated from B and will be immediately employed by an unrelated Company Y. (No corporate transaction takes place between Company A or B and Company Y).
Assume the transferred employees from Company B to Y are doing the exact same job, in the same location and under the same supervision. Company Y assumes responsibility for administering and maintaining the same level of benefits for Plan 2's tranferred 401(k) assets. When a transferred employee terminates service from Company Y, Company Y will be responsible for offering the distribution options.
II. Three months after this transaction takes place, Company A will sell all of the assets of Company B (including the other 90% of Company B employees) to an unrelated Company Z. Plan 2 will terminate shortly afterwards. Company A, nor any other member in its controlled group, will have any association with Company Z after the asset sale.
1. Is Company Y administering Company B's plan because of the "same desk rule?" What if Company Y assumed sponsorship of the transferred assets under a new plan with the same level of benefits from Plan 2?
2. If we assume that the "same desk rule" applies in I., what is the effect of the later termination of Plan 2? Does Company A or B have responsibility to the previously transferred employees now in Company Y? Does Company Y have to give the transferred employees a choice between distribution or leaving the assets in a newly created plan?
3. What is Company A or B's responsibility to the other employees upon sale to Company Z and termination of Plan 2? Are the assets distributable to these employees because Plan 2 is terminating -- 401(k)(10)(A)(i)? What about the disposition of assets or subsidiary distribution options under 401(k)(10)(A)(ii)(iii)? How does the Plan 2 termination affect the viability of using these subsections (ii) and (iii) as authority to distribute?
4. What are Company A's options for the less than 2% of employees who will be transferred to Company Z and who were eligible under Plan 1, which is not terminating?
Are 401(k) Assets Distributable in these Transactions?
I. Company B is a wholly owned subsidiary of Company A. 401(k) plan (Plan 2) covers only employees of Company B. However, less than 2% of Company B employees are eligible in Company A's 401(k) (Plan 1), but all other Company B employees are covered by Plan 2. Ten percent of Company B's employees (all of whom are eligible only for Plan 2) will be terminated from B and will be immediately employed by an unrelated Company Y. (No corporate transaction takes place between Company A or B and Company Y).
Assume the transferred employees from Company B to Y are doing the exact same job, in the same location and under the same supervision. Company Y assumes responsibility for administering and maintaining the same level of benefits for Plan 2's tranferred 401(k) assets. When a transferred employee terminates service from Company Y, Company Y will be responsible for offering the distribution options.
II. Three months after this transaction takes place, Company A will sell all of the assets of Company B (including the other 90% of Company B employees) to an unrelated Company Z. Plan 2 will terminate shortly afterwards. Company A, nor any other member in its controlled group, will have any association with Company Z after the asset sale.
1. Is Company Y administering Company B's plan because of the "same desk rule?" What if Company Y assumed sponsorship of the transferred assets under a new plan with the same level of benefits from Plan 2?
2. If we assume that the "same desk rule" applies in I., what is the effect of the later termination of Plan 2? Does Company A or B have responsibility to the previously transferred employees now in Company Y? Does Company Y have to give the transferred employees a choice between distribution or leaving the assets in a newly created plan?
3. What is Company A or B's responsibility to the other employees upon sale to Company Z and termination of Plan 2? Are the assets distributable to these employees because Plan 2 is terminating -- 401(k)(10)(A)(i)? What about the disposition of assets or subsidiary distribution options under 401(k)(10)(A)(ii)(iii)? How does the Plan 2 termination affect the viability of using these subsections (ii) and (iii) as authority to distribute?
4. What are Company A's options for the less than 2% of employees who will be transferred to Company Z and who were eligible under Plan 1, which is not terminating?
List of Stock Thrift Banks with ESOPs?
Does anyone know where I might be able to get a list of Stock Thrift Banks with ESOPs? I need only a couple of east coast states and I assume this information must be available somewhere. Also, do you have a web address for the ESOP Association?
Termination of employees when STD expires
Many of our employees our covered by an STD plan that lasts 52 weeks. When these STD benefits end, we are unsure of how we should handle these employees. Can we legally terminate them, or must we continue to keep them as employees?
Excluded Employers of a 401(k) Plan
Facts: Company X sponsors a 401(k) plan. Company X is a bro-sis group with Company Y and Company Z. Company Y is Candadian and all employees are Canadian citizens. Company Z is U.S. based as is Company X. Neither Company Y nor Company Z have any HCE's. All HCE's are employed by Company X.
Discussion: I believe Company Y can be ignored so long as the plan document excludes non-resident aliens as a statutory exemption from participation.
Questions:
1) The plan is in the process of being restated since it is switching investment carriers (standardized prototype of the investment carrier is being used). The former plan document did not exclude non-resident aliens. Is it OK to exclude them in the new document, or is that considered an illegal cut-back of benefits?
2) The standardized prototypes I have seen allow for eligibility exclusions of non-resident aliens and employees subject to collective bargaining. If it is the intent of the employer to exclude Company Z employees from participation, can this be done in a prototype environment? Assume the plan passes 410(B) by excluding Company Z employees.
3) The former plan document did not state an exclusion of employees in Company's Y or Z. Since we have a controlled group, employees of Y and Z were eligible to participate assuming they met age and service. However, the employer did not make the plan known or available to employees of Company's Y and Z. Does this mean that a QNEC to those employees is required, = to ADP of NCHE's for the years in question?
4) If I'm right about 3), which of the IRS correction programs does this issue fall under, or is self-correction an option?
Thank you for any help, I greatly appreciate it!
GUST - Amend or Restate?
Can an individually drafted 401(a) plan be updated for GUST by plan amendment rather than a complete plan restatement?
"Paid Time Off" program combining days normally granted for
We are a small industrial distributorship in Hazelwood, MO (St. Louis, MO) approximately 65 ees. We plan to initiate a new "Paid Time Off" program giving ees "x" number of days (based on tenure) to be used however they wish (i.e, sick, personal, vacation, holidays,etc.).
Has anyone recently started this type of programs in this type environment? How has it worked -- how did you start?
Terminating and establishing a new 401k plan
Under the circumstances you describe, the employer would have to wait at least a year before starting up a new defined contribution plan. When terminating a 401(k) plan and paying out the balances, there are strict requirements regarding a "successor" plan. See IRC sec. 401(k)(10) and related regs.
Notification Requirements.
Other than as provided in the SPD, is their a notification requirement with respect to Diversification Election opportunities? Is the Plan obligated to notify Qualified Participants and, if so, with what frequency?
------------------
Retirement Rights
Three years ago I was told by a company that I was no longer needed afer nearly 26 years of hard work. One of the things I found out (after investigating my retirement benefits) is that my retirement benefit is reduced a certain percentage for every year between now and retirement age. So needless to say after 26 years of building up a benefits it is now reducded to less than 40% of what I anticipated.Since I was 47 at the time of separation the 18 years to retirement reduced my benefit.I am really trying to find out if this is legal or not? Do I have any recourse in the situation? Any suggestions from anyone who has been in this type of situation? Help please.
------------------
Forfeiture Allocation
An employee is eligible to make deferrals but doesn't and therefore does not receive an employer match. Does this employee receive forfeitures of matching money resulting from an employee terminating?
Forfeitures of matching contributions are "allocated to all Participant's eligible to share in the allocations in proportion to each such Participant's Compensation for the year". I can't decide whether the employee WOULD receive the money because he was eligible to participate in the plan and chose not to, or if he WOULDN'T receive it because he wasn't deferring any money. Any thoughts? Thanks.
HELP - Restriction on Special Enrollment
Company has 2 health "plans," (A & b) where A generally provides better benefits (i.e., lower premiums, better coverage). Company's policy provides that an employee/dependent electing to enroll in company's health plan under the "Special Enrollment" HIPAA provision can only elect to enroll in B and later in open enrollment can choose A. Any thoughts on what is required by HIPAA, i.e., is each plan (A, b) a separate group health plan where Sec. 9801(f) applies separately to both or can the company satisfy this provision with its current policy?
Web site on benefit communications?
Any good websites on keeping up with the regs for SPDs and other communications???
SPD guide web sites?
Are there any recommended web sites that can help us follow the regs on SPDs?








