Jump to content

Jim Chad

Senior Contributor
  • Posts

    1,153
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Jim Chad last won the day on November 22 2020

Jim Chad had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

1,242 profile views
  1. I lean toward this correction. We have no ability to change section 402(g) of the tax code but we can add a new limit that did not exist before. Evidence of this idea is that the Empower correction form has a separate block for Plan imposed limit refunds and a separate block for 402(g) refunds.
  2. Plan was amended, HCE's limited to 4.5% deferral. An HCE that termed deferred 28%. So ADP test fails. How do I correct? Is there any basis for refunding the one HCE his excess and not count the refund in the ADP test?
  3. The two plans will have the exact same ownership. Do we need to combine the plans for testing for Top Heavy?
  4. A 401(k) is TH and has SHMAC and prevailing wage. No discretionary match or discretionary non-elective. Is 3% TH required?
  5. A standardized prototype is deemed to pass and allows you to give nothing to an employee who terminated with less than 500 hours. I have a volume submitter document that has each person in their own group. Can I exclude this employee form testing?
  6. This is an IRS code making them non employees for payroll. But the DOL does not have such a regulation. So for pension purposes, they might be employees.
  7. Aren't real estate brokers an odd group? Isn't there something unusual they can do that no one else can do? I think they are statutory non employees? Derrin Watson refers to code section 3508
  8. I agree with Bill.
  9. I believe the first plan year will have to be 12 months long. Can anyone confirm?
  10. The DOL would say that the part of their regulations that count for Plans over 100 is the part that says "As soon as reasonable" . They think that payday is reasonable, with modern computers. The 15th business day of the following month is when they come for you with handcuffs.
  11. I do them all in December.
  12. Partnership has a calanedar year plan putting deferrals for 2018, for partners in on July 1st. How do you think the IRS would view this on an audit?
  13. NO. because if you do not cap compensation properly, the IRS would say that you have a discriminator match. IMNTBHO
  14. I think I agree with Bird. I think starting a 401(k) will make all contributions in the year the 401(k) started, ineligible. If it is early enough in the year, this may be such a small problem as to be worth it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use