Jakyasar

Thank you

Hi It has been a long time since I came across this as all my plans are done on volume submitter. Somewhere in the corners of my old memory I remember that if DC plan is done as standardized prototype and if the DB plan is done a volume submitter, it was not permitted to be set up this way. Only standardized plans can be set paired?? What am I not remembering here? Thank you

Well, this as it may be, the insurance company did not allow a single bond (I think it was Colonial) and had to get 2 bonds, this was a while back. I am just sharing my experience. By the way, thank you for pointing to the example.

I was once told by an agent it should 100% of the non-qualified assets plus 10% of the qualified assets i.e. 2 separate bonds and that is what I do.

Having late Friday brain freeze DB/DC combo, non PBGC. 1M payroll, checking for 31% rule i.e. 310k deduction total If DB portion is 200k, can do 110k of DC, correct? Even though DC portion exceeds 6%, it does not exceed the 25% overall DC deduction limit. Anything I am missing? Thank you

Hi I believe the answer is no issues but always would like to confirm: Common factors: Company A has a 401k/PS plan Joe and Mary are married and have no minor children at this time Mary owns 100% Company B and has no business relationship with Company A/no affiliation Scenario 1 Joe is an officer of Company A (no ownership but CFO and making over threshold) Joe's wife Mary also an employee of Company A - for all purposes, a rank&file employee Company A provides ER contributions to both - Joe is at 415(c) dollar limit Company B - no employees other than Mary - also provides ER monies to Mary No issues as well as combined 415(c) limits for Mary, correct? Scenario 2 Now Joe owns 49% of Company A. Other 51% is owned by unrelated party. Mary is still an employee but now HCE due to attribution No issues as well as combined 415(c) limits for Mary, correct? Scenario 3 Same as Scenario 2 except Joe now is also employed by Company B Company B pays Joe 305k of salary and wants to provide Joe maximum PS - in addition to Mary So, Joe can get maximum limits in both companies separately, correct? What am I not asking here? Thank you

To all, happy and healthy New Year and Holiday. Let's see what New Year will bring. Thank you all for your wisdom and experience.

Thank you and happy holidays

To understand what you said: If they worked 1000 hours in 8 months, they enter in the 9th month, correct?

Looking at a plan doc prepared by another. Calendar plan. 401k eligibility is 6 months (in which 1000 hours of service is required) with entry date first month following completion of 6 months. Can the plan require 1000 hours of service where eligibility is 6 months? PS is 12 months with 1000 hours so this is fine. Entry date is dual entry, 1st and 7th months. Thank you

Agreed and thank you, happy holidays

It is actually a plan with other participants but wanted to check on how it could be done for the owner. So would need a deferral election form stating $6,500 and execute by 12/30/2021, correct?

A rhetorical follow up question. Assume 1 lifer and age over 50. A sole-prop earning 500k of net schedule c. Assume the plan has 401k+3% non-elective SH+PS provisions. QRP allocation will be 58k (1/7th). Wants to deduct something for 2021. SH 8,700 - covered by QRP PS 49,300 - covered by QRP Can he do 6,500 as 401k deferral catch up? This would be deductible? If yes, what does he put on the deferral election form? Thank you

I fifth it. Thank you all

Hi 100% owner Joe marries Jane who has 2 adult children from prior marriage (ignore the 1 year rule) Joe refers to them as his step-daughters. Jane and the 2 daughters work for Joe's company. Jane is an HCE by attribution. How about step-daughters? In one case assume they are adopted and in another they are non-adopted. Any other scenarios? Thank you

Thank you all for your insights.

Let me see if I understood this correctly. Minor child is deemed to own 25% of Company A because Son (minor child's dad) owns only 25% of Company A. Because the minor child owns less than 50% (or is it 50% or less?) and does not get any attribution from grandfather (75% owner), there is no CG issues. Did I understand this correctly? It is the attribution that threw me off here. Thank you

Here is a new one for me. DC plan sponsored by Company A Company A is owned by Dad 75% and Son 25%. They have employees and covered under the plan. MD office Company B is owned by Son's wife 100%. This company has 2 employees. Dental office Son and wife have minor children. 2 companies have no connection whatsoever. This is in New Jersey. Do I have controlled group issues? I would not be asking if Son owned 100%. Not sure how and if attribution plays a role in here. To complicate matters, they do not want company B in the DC plan. Company B wants to do SEP. Thank you

Oh yeah, never forgetting, thanks

Very good point, thank you for pointing out.

Good morning Drawing a blank here. Can QRP be used to satisfy 3% non-elective safe harbor (or even safe harbor match)? This is in addition to profit sharing allocation that will be provided as well. Thank you

Any takers

Hi I am fairly certain that it is ok to do the following but want to confirm: Joe owns 50% of company A (other 50% owned by unrelated person) Joe owns 100% of company B No affiliation between the 2 companies. Joe can set up a DB plan separately under each company with full 415(b) limits as long as ownership is 50% or less in company A, agree? Joe can set up a DC plan separately under each company with full 415(c) limits (58k in each company) as long as ownership is 50% or less in company A, agree? Please disregard any PBGC coverage issues as this is a general question Thanks

Hi 3 year old DB plan (combo tested with a PS plan) hard frozen early 2021 (before 1000 hours accrued) with no accruals and no further new participants. EOY val. Top heavy and PBGC covered. Assume that 401a26 will need to be tested. Any reason why I cannot use acc-to-date method for 401a26? I just cannot seem to find one but wanted to confirm. Will not test together with the PS plan for 2021 as I do not handle the administration of the PS plan i.e. not sue if historic data is correct or not - to use acc-to-date method. Thank you

Agreed and thank you for your comments