Guest pension222 Posted July 23, 2001 Posted July 23, 2001 A client has asked me about asset management fees. They have been told that according to investment industry standards, that equity management fees should not exceed 50 basis points and that fixed income management fees should not exceed 30 basis points. Does anyone have a web site or resource that I could use to address this issue?
Jon Chambers Posted July 24, 2001 Posted July 24, 2001 I'd suggest that there is no single standard for determining appropriate asset management fees. It depends on account structure (retail mutual fund, institutional mutual fund, separate account, etc.) and amount of money to be invested. If the funds to be invested are in excess of $100 million, and are invested in separate accounts, the figures you cite seem reasonable. I'm not aware of any definitive website that could support or refute this contention, or of any general rule of thumb similar to what you report. If you really want an answer, buy the Greenwich Associates money manager survey, that includes some detailed fee information, but be prepared to spend a few thousand dollars for the survey. Hope this helps, Jon C. Chambers Schultz Collins Lawson Chambers, Inc. Investment Consultants
Guest Alan_Valenca Posted July 24, 2001 Posted July 24, 2001 You might want to also check out the recent article on PlanSponsor.com "Fee for All" which talks about the "transparency" of fees issue and some new ways of handling it with clients: www.plansponsor.com/content/magazine/FeeForAll Hope that helps.
RCK Posted July 25, 2001 Posted July 25, 2001 What investment management fees "should" be is a function of several things, but chiefly the size of the fund and the kind of fund that it is. A reasonable fee range for an actively managed small cap growth fund may be 1.00 to 1.25% per year. And the fee for a large Indexed equity fund could be in the 0.05 to 0.10% per year. The investment management fee that we pay for a $200 million S & P 500 index fund is 5 basis points (or .05%). That is the result of a tiered schedule, that starts out at .2% and grades down to .03%. RCK
david rigby Posted July 25, 2001 Posted July 25, 2001 Another similar discussion. http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=10747 I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now