Guest Jan C Posted February 15, 1999 Posted February 15, 1999 The first year of a new calendar year plan is 1997. The Top-Heavy determination date for the first year is 12/31/97. The only asset as of 12/31/97 is the 1997 contribution of $30K which is entirely receivable ($20K to Key EEs and $10K to Non-Key EEs). For the first year of a plan, receivable contribution amounts ARE included when determining the Top-Heavy ratio, therefore, the Plan is Top-Heavy for 1997 since the T-H ratio would be 66.67%. For the second year of this Plan (1998), the T-H determination date would be 12/31/97 as well. IRS Reg. 1.416-1 says that you DO NOT include receivable amounts determining the T-H ratio for the second plan year and forward. Since, if you do not include receivable amounts, the account balances as of 12/31/97 for all participants is $0.00. DOES THIS MEAN THAT THE PLAN IS NOT TOP-HEAVY FOR 1998?? (The Top-Heavy equation for 1998 is 0 divided by 0 = undefined.) Common sense leads me to believe it IS Top-Heavy for 1998, since if any amount at all of the 1997 contribution was deposited by December 31, 1997, it would be Top-Heavy for 1998.
david rigby Posted February 18, 1999 Posted February 18, 1999 I don't agree with your analysis of the Regs. My read of 1.416-1, Q&A T-24, is that the accrued contribution is included. Therefore, the 12/31/97 T-H ratio of 66.67% would stand as applicable for the 1998 plan year. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.