Guest Bergy Posted August 26, 2002 Posted August 26, 2002 We have an individual who is on House Arrest right now. He is living with a family member. He is trying to qualify for a Hardship Withdrawal so he has money to pay for first month's rent and such once he is released from House Arrest. I don't think this qualifies...your thoughts?
Mike Preston Posted August 26, 2002 Posted August 26, 2002 Does the plan have the safe harbor rules with respect to hardship? If not, I would think that it most certainly satisfies the general definition. Besides, I'm a little bit curious. Is this person still employed? If not, wouldn't they be eligible for a regular distribution at some point? Or is there some sort of delay with respect to termination distributions (not payable until after 1 year break in service, for example) that the participant is trying to finesse with a hardship? If you implement the safe-harbor rules the participant must fully exhaust their ability to borrow from the plan before a hardship can be granted. With a slight twist, even the safe-harbor rules might be satisfied. Just have the place he is currently under house arrest insist on a rental payment or else they will evict. Wouldn't that satisfy the need?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now