Scott Posted October 3, 2002 Posted October 3, 2002 Plan A is merging into Plan B. Plan A's normal retirement age is the later of age 60 or 5 years of service, while Plan B's NRA is age 65. Plan A's employer contributions are subject to a graded vesting schedule, while all contributions to Plan B are immediately vested. After the merger, must Plan A's NRA be preserved for Plan A participants? Would it make any difference if the Plan A participants are given full vesting in their pre-merger Plan A contributions?
RTK Posted October 3, 2002 Posted October 3, 2002 I am not sure that normal retirement age is defined as a protected benefit. However, the normal retirement age is used for 100% vesting, time of payment requirements , and in db plans, the amount of benefit and funding requirements. To the extent the change of NRA impacts one of these, there is at least an issue to review.
david rigby Posted October 3, 2002 Posted October 3, 2002 I believe that plan A's NRA must be preserved for the plan A portion of the benefit. But you have to look to the document to see what happens next. NRA (as defined in the Code) is for the purpose (primarily) of setting 100% vesting, as RTK states. Look to the plan for its definition of NRD. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.