Guest Mike Schwing Posted January 28, 2003 Posted January 28, 2003 As a TPA we've always taken the approach that if an HCE is required to get a refund due to an ADP failure, that if there is any match associated to the ADP refund we forfeit this match. I know there is an opposing view to this but we've felt more comfortable forfeiting the match. This was never a problem under are TRA 86 document which did not allow for pay period match. Now with the GUST restatment many plan's use the pay period match. I don't see a way to determine the match forfeiture for an ADP failure if the match is done on a pay period basis other than to base it on the whole year.
Mike Preston Posted January 28, 2003 Posted January 28, 2003 I don't disagree. Why does this cause you any concern?
four01kman Posted January 28, 2003 Posted January 28, 2003 What's the problem? Do the forfeiture at year end. The forfeiture amount shouldn't have anything to do with the mid-year allocation. Arguably, the failure of the ADP test doesn't occur until year-end, so the forfeiture doesn't occur until year-end. Jim Geld
Alf Posted January 28, 2003 Posted January 28, 2003 The match has to be returned even in a pay period match plan or else 1) the HCE gets a higer overall match rate than others which is discriminatory and 2) the plan says the match is X of deferrals and if she gets more, the plan terms are being violated.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now