Guest lhead7601 Posted July 7, 2003 Posted July 7, 2003 I have a client with approximately 9,000 "lost" participants with accrued benefits of less than $10. All have had checks issued via force-out and returned so they are in a "outstanding check" status. Can anyone describe for me the legal requirements for handling these? My client operates in Minnesota - I haven't had a chance to look up their escheatment rules - I'm thinking that is their only option. Thanks for your input.
mbozek Posted July 8, 2003 Posted July 8, 2003 IF this is a DC plan why not just forfeit the benefits subject to reinstatement if the participant shows up at a later date. See. Reg. 1.411(a)-4((b)(6). Just amend the plan to provide for forfeiture. Or you could just make a distribution of 100% as withholding to the IRS but why give up the funds?. DB benefits are to be turned in to the PBGC. mjb
E as in ERISA Posted July 8, 2003 Posted July 8, 2003 But beware that regulation technically only applies to participants who are truly lost.
Guest lhead7601 Posted July 9, 2003 Posted July 9, 2003 Thanks - didn't even think about that reg. Appreciate the idea. I'll research further.
Lynn Campbell Posted July 9, 2003 Posted July 9, 2003 Would this work? Charge each person $10 for processing the check?
maverick Posted July 9, 2003 Posted July 9, 2003 I have an idea similar to Lynn's. Amend the plan so the annual/SA/quarterly/monthly per-participant recordkeeping fees come from plan assets. These $10 accounts would be wiped out in short order.
ljr Posted July 9, 2003 Posted July 9, 2003 As to charging fees to the participant accounts, remember that even though the DOL thinks it's okay to charge terminated participants but not active ones, the IRS doesn't seem to agree.
Guest saber Posted July 10, 2003 Posted July 10, 2003 Take a look at IRS Revenue Procedure 2003-44 Section 6.02 (5)(b) and see if that applies to your plan.
david rigby Posted July 10, 2003 Posted July 10, 2003 http://benefitslink.com/IRS/revproc2003-44.shtml I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now