Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Employer has established a 401(k) plan. Employer tells all participants that they can only defer 12%, and that he will match no more than 5%.

An employee gross salary is $50,000 per year. He wants to defer 24% ...( $50,000 x24% = $12,000). But employer tells him that the plan document/ adoption agreement says that no more than 12% can be deferred.

Employee thinks that the new tax law (egtrra) allows him to defer up to 100% per year, as long as he defers no more than $12,000.

Who is correct ? (The employer or the employee).

Posted

The employer is correct as long as the plan document is in accordance with what he is saying. A plan can limit deferrals to any level. The EGTRRA changes simply represent the maximum allowable amount that can be deferred.

"What's in the big salad?"

"Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."

Posted

Blinky the 3-eyed fish is of course right.

It seems to me that the logical of the employee's position is that he should be allowed to defer $12,000 even if the employer did not offer a 401(k) plan--clearly a non-sensical result.

RCK

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use