Guest jhilliard Posted July 31, 2003 Posted July 31, 2003 I have a client who utilizes the automatic enrollment feature; recently this sponsor was told that this increases the fiduciary's liability. I thought they were covered by ERISA? Are they truly more liable than if they did not use automatic enrollment? Any articles that I can share with them to ease their pains would be appreciated. Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
R. Butler Posted July 31, 2003 Posted July 31, 2003 Automatic Enrollment is permissable (see Rev. Rul. 2000-8), but that doesn't mean that there won't be exposure to possible liability. Most concerns that I've read involve: 1. State payroll withholding laws. 2. Fiduciary responsibility for investments if participant doesn't make an affirmative election (see Rev. Rul. 2000-8). 3. There are Notice requirements that the Plan Sponsor must meet.
Guest jhilliard Posted July 31, 2003 Posted July 31, 2003 R. Butler - Where can I see Rev. Rul. 2000-8? J-
R. Butler Posted July 31, 2003 Posted July 31, 2003 I e-mailed a copy to you. If you didn't get it you can search Benefitslink using IRS source documents link & find it easy enough.
Brian Gallagher Posted July 31, 2003 Posted July 31, 2003 When a person is automatically enrolled, contributions may go to a default investment. Would there be a compliance issue with 404© and the participant investment direction piece of it? Therein would lie some fiducuiary laibility. Remember: two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now