Brian Gallagher Posted August 28, 2003 Posted August 28, 2003 I have a plan that is going to make the Top Heavy minimum as a Profit Sharing contribution--3% of comp for the eligibles. The person who prepared the allocation for me merely took 3% of the eligible comp. The plan is integrated w/ social security. There was no contribution listed for the ecess comp. is that correct--it's just a straight 3% even if it's integrated? Your thought are appreciated. Remember: two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
WDIK Posted August 28, 2003 Posted August 28, 2003 One of the prototype documents we have used applies a tiered approach for allocating contributions on an integrated basis. Step 1) 3% to all eligible Step 2) 3% of salary over TWB. Step 3) 2.7% to all eligbile Step 4) 2.7% of salary over TWB Step 5) Pro-rata of any additional amounts. Of course this would be modified slightly if the TWB is not used as the integration level. This seems to fit in with the approach you mentioned. Of course, it will probably come down to the actual language in the plan document. ...but then again, What Do I Know?
Brian Gallagher Posted August 28, 2003 Author Posted August 28, 2003 Let me restate my question: Is the Top Heavy minimum subject to the integration? Or is it just a straight 3%? Remember: two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
WDIK Posted August 28, 2003 Posted August 28, 2003 If I understand your question better now, my response is that the top-heavy minimum is 3% without regard to integration. ...but then again, What Do I Know?
Brian Gallagher Posted August 28, 2003 Author Posted August 28, 2003 Thanks. That's what I thought. Evidently we did add 3% to the excess comp in the past, but since it was a Profit Sharing contrib, I guess it didn't really matter--TH was satisfied anyway. Remember: two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
david rigby Posted August 28, 2003 Posted August 28, 2003 IRS Reg. 1.416-1. http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/cfrhtml...26cfrv5_00.html Q&A M-11 M-11 Q. May either the defined benefit minimum or the defined contribution minimum be integrated with social security? A. No. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now