Guest danwintz Posted December 3, 1999 Share Posted December 3, 1999 I apologize if this question has already been asked and answered, but I did not find it on this Message Board's history. The Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association maintains a grandfathered 401(k) plan. Participation in the Association by cities is elective. May a city (which has not previously maintained a 401(k) plan) now join the association and allow its employees to participate in the 401(k) plan? The following is an excerpt from the Association's description of the plan. PERA's 401(k) Plan was established on July 1, 1985, to enhance the retirement savings opportunities of PERA members. The 401(k) Plan provides all Colorado PERA members with a vehicle they can use to voluntarily invest some of their income tax-deferred. Any active and contributing member of PERA is eligible to contribute to the Plan from his or her PERA-covered earned income. Your 401(k) contributions are in addition to your mandatory PERA defined benefit contributions of 8% of salary State Troopers and employees of CBI contribute 10% of salary). You can choose to contribute from as little as 1 percent to as much as 23 percent of salary plus Section 125 plan deductions, or you may designate a dollar amount (a minimum of 1 percent of salary is required). All comments will be appreciated. ------------------ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dowist Posted December 4, 1999 Share Posted December 4, 1999 Is PERA a state entity, or some trade association? If a state entity, you'll find that there are some rulings that say that other state entities may adopt a grandfathered state plan. If some sort of trade association (and it doesn't sound like it is), I wouldn't think a "new" employer could be grandfathered by adopting the association's plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carol V. Calhoun Posted December 4, 1999 Share Posted December 4, 1999 We have a ruling request in for a client on that very issue, right now. And so far, the IRS doesn't seem to know quite what to do with it. They have made some suggestion that maybe it is okay if every city is required to join, but not otherwise, but it's not clear that is a consensus view. We'll keep you posted. -------------------------------------- Employee benefits legal resource site Employee benefits legal resource site The opinions of my postings are my own and do not necessarily represent my law firm's position, strategies, or opinions. The contents of my postings are offered for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. A visit to this board or an exchange of information through this board does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should consult directly with an attorney for individual advice regarding your particular situation. I am not your lawyer under any circumstances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now