Carol V. Calhoun Posted June 22, 2000 Share Posted June 22, 2000 No. Even in the context of a 401(k) plan, a plan need not require employees to suspend contributions if the employer is willing to use other means to determine whether an employee has other resources with which to meet the financial need. In a 457 plan, the safe harbor of requiring the suspension of contributions is not available, so the employer must always verify whether the employee has other financial resources which could be used to meet the financial need. In doing so, the employer should consider whether the employee plans to make future contributions only insofar as discontinuing contributions might in some instances be an alternative way of meeting the need. ------------------ Employee benefits legal resource site Employee benefits legal resource site The opinions of my postings are my own and do not necessarily represent my law firm's position, strategies, or opinions. The contents of my postings are offered for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. A visit to this board or an exchange of information through this board does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should consult directly with an attorney for individual advice regarding your particular situation. I am not your lawyer under any circumstances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pwilbanks Posted June 22, 2000 Share Posted June 22, 2000 Are employees required to suspend contributions for 12 months to a 457 plan after an unforeseen emergency withdrawal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now