Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

If you are talking about the 401(k) safe harbor rules, the non-elective contribution has to be 3%. Or, the plan could do the safe harbor matching contribution instead. Either way, if only the safe harbor contributions are made, the plan doesn't have to worry about top heavy.

Carolyn

Posted

I've got a plan with an exempt group and a non-exempt group. They want one plan but have different benefit levels in mind for each group. there are about 85 exempt, 20 of which are HCEs. the other group has about 900 people. (non-union). They want to give the nonexempt a 2% profit sharing contribution, let them defer and not match. The exempt get to defer and get a match but no PS.

Safe harbor isn't an option?

Posted

The safe harbor will not do what you want here, but keep in mind that the reason to do a safe harbor is to allow for the ADP and/or ACP testing to pass. Is that the motivation here?

"What's in the big salad?"

"Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."

Posted

there are NO union employees. Just salaried (exempt) and hourly (non-exempt). The exempt employees are one group, the non-exempt are the other group. The exempt group has the HCEs. The non-exempt has no HCEs. The exempt group is getting a different benefit than the non-exempt group.

Posted
The non-exempt has no HCEs.

This is the answer to the first question. You did NOT need to repeat the answer to the second question as if I was asking it again NOR did you need to repeat the items you stated before.

Oops, I am busy now and will have to get back to you later on this.

"What's in the big salad?"

"Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use