Guest rachd Posted February 18, 2004 Posted February 18, 2004 I rarely deal with IRA's so I don't know a lot about them.... however, question has been asked from a smaller employer (w/terrible employee deferral average) as to how they can increase their (HCE) contributions for retirement. They are thinking an IRA (maybe a Roth?) but I cannot figure out what their limits would be for contributions. Obviously, for their 401K, they must pass the ADP/ACP test. They are not interested in changing their plan design (i.e. Safe Harbor). Can anyone help me with the max contributions they could do for an IRA? Thanks, Rachel
WDIK Posted February 18, 2004 Posted February 18, 2004 They are not interested in changing their plan design (i.e. Safe Harbor). What is their current plan design? ...but then again, What Do I Know?
Guest rachd Posted February 18, 2004 Posted February 18, 2004 It's a regular 401K- they have poor employee participation (even with a matching contribution) so they are VERY restricted as to what they can contribute.
WDIK Posted February 18, 2004 Posted February 18, 2004 I know that this isn't answering your original question, but I am curious as to why they are opposed to a safe harbor plan. If the plan already provides a match and participation is still poor, what additional exposure does the employer expect? It sounds like a perfect situation for a plan with a safe harbor match. ...but then again, What Do I Know?
RCK Posted February 18, 2004 Posted February 18, 2004 This may not be a perfect situation for a Safe Harbor design if the existing design is lean--say a match of 20% of the first 5% with a 5 year graded vesting schedule. If that is the case, the move to safe harbor matching, and safe harbor vesting can be breath-takingly expensive. The lesser cost approach is to increase NHCE participation in the current design by adding loans and hardships (if they are not already features), and then communicating the benefits of 401(k) participation. Relentless communication can be as effective in increasing participation as improved plan design. I'm also a big believer in automatic enrollment (it's worked for us), but that does carry some philosophical issues. RCK
WDIK Posted February 18, 2004 Posted February 18, 2004 This may not be a perfect situation for a Safe Harbor design if the existing design is lean--say a match of 20% of the first 5% with a 5 year graded vesting schedule. Point well taken. I should have considered that the match might be very minimal, since the employer apparently is only interested in increasing benefits for HCE. ...but then again, What Do I Know?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now