Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A client received a notice from the US Bankruptcy Court informing them to stop the loan repayment deduction for a participant in their 401(k) plan. The Notice cited the 6th Circuit Court's 1995 decision in Harshbarger. Is there any more current information that I can look at regarding this situation?

Posted

Since bankruptcy law is not preempted by ERISA, bkcy ct orders to cease loan repayments are applicable to pension and PS plans. It allows the plan to stop payroll withholding without violating the rule that a plan loan must be a legally enforceable obligation to repay the amount borrowed. Of course, ceasing repayments will result in a default under IRC 72p which will require payment of taxes on the outstanding loan balance. Be interested if the cases cited have any different conclusion.

mjb

Posted

All three cases deal with whether plan loan repayments will stop in order to provide more disposable income or if the loan will be paid off before the unsecured creditors.

None of the cases questioned the right of a bankruptcy court to stop loan repayments, if the court felt it was appropriate.

The Buchferer case stands out because it is one of the few cases to consider a plan loan to be a secured debt.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use