Guest Bud Posted March 10, 2004 Posted March 10, 2004 Deceased participant was in a same-sex marriage. Participant's enrollment form indicated he was married. Spouse is the designated beneficiary. Should we allow a rollover? I assume the designated beneficiary's tax return will indicate single. Wouldn't a rollover of a death benefit by a single person or "non-spouse" trigger some kind of flag with the IRS?
mbozek Posted March 10, 2004 Posted March 10, 2004 Since no state recognizes same sex marriage at this time I dont see how there could be a rollover by the bene. Also, under the defense of marriage act, the definition of spouse under any provision of federal law is a member of the opposite sex. mjb
Guest Bud Posted March 10, 2004 Posted March 10, 2004 Great. Now my plan and company will get dragged into the debate in the papers and will become the test defendant in Northern California District Court.
mbozek Posted March 10, 2004 Posted March 10, 2004 Why not ask the beneficiary for a valid marriage certificate? No certificate, no eligibility for rollover. Also the lawsuit would have to be brought against the IRS because IRS rules do not not allow the rollover of benefits by persons who are members of the same sex as the deceased owner. mjb
jsb Posted March 11, 2004 Posted March 11, 2004 In CA California Family Code section 300 defines marriage as being between a man and a woman. Not possible for a man to be a spouse of another man under CA law. As is currently posted on the Cafeteria Plan board regarding medical reimbursement, federal law would in any event override CA state law as the plan issue is governed by IRS regs. In this case, however, Fed law also defines marriage as between a man and a woman.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now