Jump to content

401(a)(17) ($160,000) compensation cap and the 403(b)(2) exclusion all

Guest mike webb

Recommended Posts

Guest mike webb

Is "Includible compensation" for purposes of the 403(B)(2) exclusion allowance limited to the 401(a)(17) compensation cap (currently $160,000)? Example 20 of the updated IRS Examination Guidelines for 403(b)plans indicates that "Compensation" for 415 limit purposes is limited to $160,000, but is seemingly silent with regard to 403(B)(2).


Mike W.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest CVCalhoun

This is a tough one! Under I.R.C. § 403(B)(12)(A)(i), the I.R.C. § 401(a)(17) compensation limit is applied in measuring discrimination. Thus, it would appear that using the larger amount of compensation to calculate the exclusion allowance, even if technically permitted, could easily result in nondiscrimination problems. This would be true even for governmental plans, which although exempt from most of I.R.C. § 403(B)(12)(A)(i) due to I.R.C. § 401(B)(5)(G), are not exempt from I.R.C. § 401(a)(17).

However, in looking at a salary-reduction-only plan, nothing appears to require that I.R.C. § 401(a)(17) be followed in measuring compensation for maximum exclusion allowance purposes.


Employee benefits legal resource site

[Note: This message has been edited by CVCalhoun]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Create New...