Belgarath Posted April 15, 2004 Posted April 15, 2004 You have a safe harbor 401(k) plan effective 10-1-03, so first year is a short plan year. Employees, obviously, are only allowed to defer on income on or after 10-1-03. But what about the sole prop owner? Can he defer based upon entire year schedule C income? Since this income is earned technically on 12-31-03, a literal reading would seem to indicate that he could. But this also produces a result which appears discriminatory, in that rank & file get to defer based upon 1/4 of their income, and the sole prop gets to use 100%. Any thoughts?
Archimage Posted April 15, 2004 Posted April 15, 2004 Why not think of it another way. I am assuming your client earned at least $20,000 in the last quarter. Why not just say he decided to defer $12,000 to $14,000 of that $20,000?
Belgarath Posted April 15, 2004 Author Posted April 15, 2004 Yes, thank you - I had already considered that approach. But based on the client's preliminary estimate, the income will be more like 40,000 for 2003. First year of the business - in 2004 he's already estimating in excess of 300,000. Which is why he wants to defer the max for 2003.
Archimage Posted April 15, 2004 Posted April 15, 2004 I guess it would fully depend on what the document said. I can't think of any regulation that would make you pro-rate his earned income over the year.
jquazza Posted April 16, 2004 Posted April 16, 2004 I agree with Archimage, and I would add, since this is the first plan year, you shouldn't even have a short limitation year, so you don't have to prorate the annual compensation limit. /JPQ
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now