Lori Foresz Posted April 22, 2004 Posted April 22, 2004 Doctor is 100% owner of medical corp with one employee. Doctor's wife has a trade or business that operates as a sole proprietor that established a DB plan and covers the doctors (husband) as an EE. My reading seems to imply that the group is a common controll group and that the spousal exception rule does not apply (since the spouse is an EE). So, both businesses would be 100% owned by the the doctor (he is deemed to own 100% of his wife's sole prop) and failing to cover the EE of the doctor's corp would be a problem. Does anyone see this analysis as wrong? If so, please tell. Thanks
Appleby Posted April 23, 2004 Posted April 23, 2004 1.414©-4(b)(5) (ii) (B) seems to support your analysis…it states “Such individual is not a member of the board of directors, a fiduciary, or an employee of such organization and does not participate in the management of such organization at any time during such taxable year;” Life and Death Planning for Retirement Benefits by Natalie B. Choatehttps://www.ataxplan.com/life-and-death-planning-for-retirement-benefits/ www.DeniseAppleby.com
Lori Foresz Posted April 23, 2004 Author Posted April 23, 2004 Thanks Appleby. It's amazing how many advisors overlook controlled group rules when setting up plans for clients. I appreciate your response. Thanks!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now