Guest Smokin Posted May 19, 2004 Posted May 19, 2004 An independent trustee candidate for a directed account holding employer stock wants to be indemnified for negligent acts other than breaches of fiduciary duty. The trustee does not seek indemnification for willful acts or gross negligence. What specific risk is the trustee trying to address?
k man Posted May 19, 2004 Posted May 19, 2004 one could only speculate but are you referring to an institutional trustee or an individual?
Jon Chambers Posted May 24, 2004 Posted May 24, 2004 At the risk of being glib, I doubt that they are seeking indemnity for any specific risk, rather, they seek indemnity for all breaches that are neither willful acts or gross negligence, or breaches of fiduciary duty. This could include any number of common law contractual breaches that would typically be state law claims that weren't preempted by ERISA. Jon C. Chambers Schultz Collins Lawson Chambers, Inc. Investment Consultants
Kirk Maldonado Posted May 24, 2004 Posted May 24, 2004 The trustee could also be concerned about securites laws issues. Kirk Maldonado
Guest rmeigs Posted May 25, 2004 Posted May 25, 2004 This is pretty common practice for institutional trustees to seek indemnity for all breaches that are neither willful acts, gross negligence, or breaches of fiduciary duty.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now