TPAVP Posted May 27, 2004 Posted May 27, 2004 Contigent Beneficiaries are his children. If Participant died first, benefit goes to his kids. If not, it would go to her estate. Both parties agree that time of death was at the same time and are willing to split benefit. Benefit in excess of $1 mil. They want to keep tax deferred status. Any opinion or cites on legality of this and tax options they may have??
david rigby Posted May 27, 2004 Posted May 27, 2004 Should we presume that the plan's provisions have been reviewed, especially with respect to defining a beneficiary, or successor beneficiary? I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
jevd Posted May 27, 2004 Posted May 27, 2004 Check state simultaneous death rules as to presumtion of who died first. This is generally not stated in the plan document. JEVD Making the complex understandable.
Harwood Posted May 27, 2004 Posted May 27, 2004 Does the "Uniform Simultaneous Death Act" come into play?
TPAVP Posted May 27, 2004 Author Posted May 27, 2004 beneficiary is defined as, "the person or persons entitiled to receive the benefits which may be payable upon or after a participant's death"
TPAVP Posted May 27, 2004 Author Posted May 27, 2004 I have done some research on the USDA and it does not appear that the state of Louisiana has adopted it. Although, I'm not sure if we could apply it to the situation or not. I just don't know how we can assign benefits to her children if the beneficiary was not alive upon death of the participant. Maybe an estate attorney would help. I'm just not sure as to where the plan leaves off and the state laws pick up. The document states clearly that if the primary beneficiary dies first, the benefits go to the contingent beneficiaries. Just don't know about simultaneous death.... AG
Kirk Maldonado Posted May 27, 2004 Posted May 27, 2004 Isn't there an issue as to whether ERISA preempts the Uniform Simultaneous Death Act? Kirk Maldonado
E as in ERISA Posted May 27, 2004 Posted May 27, 2004 Can you do an interpleader and deposit the benefit with the court and let it decide?
mbozek Posted May 27, 2004 Posted May 27, 2004 If the parties are willing to settle the dispute voluntarily why should the plan admin object. There are two ways to settle : 1- all the parties (including the personal representatives of minor children) agree to receive a share of the benefits and provide the plan admin with waviers, releases and hold harmless agreements. 2 the plan admin can file a complaint in interpleader in fed ct. naming all of the beneficaries as defendants and then the parties can stipulate to the settlement of the benefits. This option is more expensive than the first option because of the cost of retaining a lawyer to draft the complaint and the filing fees but it is a decree entered by the ct. Your should consult with counsel to determine the best option. mjb
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now