Guest ELS Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 Our firm has taken over a client whose document was previously updated for GUST and EGTRRA. For various reasons, we are restating their document to a prototype offered by the new investment provider. We are confused about how to handle the EGTRRA amendment adoption. Do we use the effective date of the restated document, which will closely coincide with the adoption date? Thanks for your help!
g8r Posted June 20, 2004 Posted June 20, 2004 I would use the effective date of the restatement. You are restating the entire plan so all components should have the same restatement effective date - unless you want a later effective date for a particular provision that you are changing as part of the restatement.
Blinky the 3-eyed Fish Posted June 21, 2004 Posted June 21, 2004 The various provisions affected by EGTRRA all have either set or variable effective dates. When the EGTRRA amendment was adopted the first time, the various provision effective dates were set at that time. Why aren't you effectively just readopting the EGTRRA amendment already done? I don't see why there is a decision to be made here. "What's in the big salad?" "Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now