Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Are state laws regarding withholding preempted by ERISA? I understand that New York State does not permit withholding without consent, which precludes the option of selecting the negative election option in a NYS 401(k) plan. Has anyone challenged this, or does it even need challenging if ERISA preempts the state law?

Posted

I believe the popular belief is that ERISA preempts state wage withholding laws to the extent that those laws relate to an employee benefit plan. There has been some discussion as to whether a prohibition against negative elections is contrary to ERISA, and if not, whether it is sufficiently related to the plan as to require preemption. That is, negative elections are not "necessary" to an ERISA plan (as it can operate just fine with affirmative consent), but I haven't heard of any cases where the matter has been decided. I had heard that there were cases pending in NY, CA and AZ on this point - but have lost track. Anyone have any update?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use