Guest Rexx Posted September 2, 2004 Posted September 2, 2004 Hi, I had a question about a potentioal prohibited transaction. If an investment advisor were to provide their employees a retirement plan, would making themselves the broker of record and therefore receiving comissions be considered a prohibited transaction? Thanks
Guest TrustMe401k Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 See also DOL PTE 77-9 (as amended and now PTE 84-24)
R. Butler Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 Would 77-9 apply? Per the post tthe person receiving commissions is the employer. I didn't think that PTE 77-9 covered employers. I may agree about PTE 79-60, it would probably be worth looking into.
Guest Rexx Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 From what I found on PTE 79-60: Insurance Agents-In-House - Permits sale of insurance to plan by an agent or broker who is the plan sponsor or a related person. This could sort of apply to the situation, but it's not really insurance. I'm surprised this doesn't seem to be clearly addressed. In a nutshell, the plan sponsor is considering being the broker of record on their own retirement plan. There are assets in the plan already and if they took the plan over, it would result in a comission.
Guest Dook Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 If it is not insurance, then I don't know of any guidance. Check this link for DOL exemption procedure information: http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/regs/ind_exemptionsmain.html
Guest dbvail Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 In the absence of current information, I'll offer that in 1990 a local business owner, who was also an agent, was paid the commission on his plan. As a result of a 'random' audit, the case was forwarded to the DOL who promptly had him repay the several thousand dollars. I assume they had support for the action. Self dealing and exclusive benefit etc? Hope this helps.
Guest Pensions in Paradise Posted September 4, 2004 Posted September 4, 2004 Let's be real. Even if it is not a PT, do you think it is advisable for a plan sponsor to engage in that sort of activity. The participants could sue at any time for breach of fiduciary duty (unless of course the plan sponsor/broker was paid an extremely low commission which could not be challenged in court).
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now