Brian Gallagher Posted September 10, 2004 Posted September 10, 2004 A person took a loan for 5 years for a primary residence. Can he refinance it for an add'l 15 yrs? (Plan allows for 20 yr mortgage loans) Remember: two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
Brian Gallagher Posted September 14, 2004 Author Posted September 14, 2004 ... Remember: two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
chris Posted September 14, 2004 Posted September 14, 2004 Don't know that refinancing would meet the Sec. 72 requirements. See the discussion at http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=25857
Brian Gallagher Posted September 14, 2004 Author Posted September 14, 2004 Unfortunately, the discussion is about what exacty "acquisition" is. The person has already bought the house with the loan. If he had taken a regular 3 yr loan, he would be able to refinance it under the new regs to 5 yrs. However, since this is for the "acquisition", can the loan be refi'd for longer than the 5 yrs? I'm quite comfortable that the fact pattern qualifies under 72, but can it be done after the fact, so to speak? Remember: two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
chris Posted September 15, 2004 Posted September 15, 2004 From Q/A-20 of the Regs: (2) Loans that repay a prior loan and have a later repayment date. For purposes of section 72(p)(2) and this section (including the amount limitations of section 72(p)(2)(A)), if a loan that satisfies section 72(p)(2) is replaced by a loan (a replacement loan) and the term of the replacement loan ends after the latest permissible term of the loan it replaces (the replaced loan), then the replacement loan and the replaced loan are both treated as outstanding on the date of the transaction. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the latest permissible term of the replaced loan is the latest date permitted under section 72(p)(2)© (i.e., five years from the original date of the replaced loan, assuming that the replaced loan does not qualify for the exception at section 72(p)(2)(B)(ii) for principal residence plan loans and that no additional period of suspension applied to the replaced loan under Q&A–9 (b) of this section). I guess it depends on how you interpret the underlined text above. One interpretation could be that the "latest permissible term" of the replaced loan, ie, the 5 yr loan would actually be 20 yrs. b/c that's what the plan allows for MTG loans (which is via the exception at section 72(p)(2)(B)(ii)). Query why the participant didn't get a 20 yr. MTG loan from the plan in the first place.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now