DP Posted September 20, 2004 Posted September 20, 2004 I have a takeover plan where one participant has a plan loan. There is no written loan policy for the plan. The loan papers she signed does not say anything about the loan being due upon termination of employment. The owner is terminating the plan as of 9/30/04 and will be closing his business as of 11/30/04. We were wanting to make distributions to the participants in October. Can I go ahead and distribute this participant's remaining account balance in October and give her until 11/30/04 (date of her termination) to pay back the loan? If she doesn't pay it back, then would the loan balance become a taxable distribution with no withholding? Thanks for any help on this.
chris Posted September 21, 2004 Posted September 21, 2004 I would think the unpaid balance would be treated as an additional distribution upon termination of the Plan since there would be no Plan to pay it back to. I'm sure there is a cite out there for a Reg. or a Tax Court case but don't have it off the top of my head. From the distribution side of it wouldn't you be in the same place even if the participant were able to pay it all back, i.e., ( unrepaid balance on date of termination + actual amount in plan = distribution ) = ( actual amount in plan (which includes repaid balance) = distribution)?
jevd Posted September 21, 2004 Posted September 21, 2004 The only difference would be the ability to rollover the entire benefit and avoid tax on the loan. JEVD Making the complex understandable.
Bird Posted September 22, 2004 Posted September 22, 2004 If you treated the loan as a deemed distribution in October, she would still have 60 days to roll the taxable amount into her IRA. No different, from her standpoint, from keeping the plan open and repaying the loan to the plan before distribution. Ed Snyder
jevd Posted September 22, 2004 Posted September 22, 2004 I don't believe a deemed distribution is rollable. Can you support your statement? JEVD Making the complex understandable.
Lori Friedman Posted September 22, 2004 Posted September 22, 2004 I think that Bird might be confusing a deemed distribution with an offset. Lori Friedman
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now