Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest curmudgeon
Posted

It seems that everyone thinks that this is sanctioned by both the IRS and DOL. My question is in what guidance did the IRS sanction it? I've been referred to Rev.Rul. 2004-10, but that addresses administrative fees charged to termed participants and not to actively employed. Are people simply using this as a basis to say the other is o.k. too?

Posted

Are you talking about a fee to process the distribution, or a fee for the participant to receive a package of information detailing how to get a distribution?

Guest curmudgeon
Posted

The fee to get the package for the distribution. I've always rejected this becuase of the significant detriment issue. Passing on the check fee has never been an issue, but now it seems that it is becoming policy to charge for all of it. Are people just pretending the entire charge is for processing, and using that as justification?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use